About the Journal

Journal title Indonesia Berdaya Indonesia Berdaya
Abbreviation Indones. Berdaya.
Language English (preferred), Indonesian
ISSN 2721-0669 (Online), 2716-3822 (Print)
Frequency 4 issues per year (January, April, July, and October)
DOI 10.47679/ib by Crossref
First Published 2020
Publisher Utan Kayu Publishing
Email [email protected]
Citation Analysis Google Scholar
OAI https://ukinstitute.org/journals/ib/oai

 

Focus and Scope

The aim of this journal publication is to disseminate conceptual thoughts, ideas, and research results that have been achieved in the area of community services.

Indonesia Berdaya particularly focuses on the main problems in the development of the sciences of community services in the following areas:

  1. Community Services, People and Health;
  2. Training, Marketing, Appropriate Technology, Design;
  3. Community Empowerment, Social Access;
  4. Student Community Services;
  5. Border Region, Less Developed Region;
  6. Education for Sustainable Development.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

Peer Review Process

Every article submitted to the editorial office will undergo a Desk Review and Initial Manuscript Evaluation conducted by the Editorial Board. Manuscripts that pass the initial evaluation will be sent to peer reviewers (Mitra Bebestari) for further assessment through a Double-Blind Peer-Review Process.

Following the review process, manuscripts will be returned to the authors for revision when necessary. These processes are expected to take a maximum of four weeks.

Each manuscript will be evaluated by peer reviewers based on substantive and technical aspects. The peer reviewers collaborating with Indonesia Berdaya are experts in relevant community service disciplines and related fields. They have experience in scholarly publication and journal management at national and international levels.

Further details regarding the peer-review policy and process are available in the journal's submission guidelines.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

Publication Frequency

Indonesia Berdaya is published four times a year, in January, April, July, and October.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

Open Access Policy

This journal is an open-access journal that provides immediate, worldwide, barrier-free access to the full text of all published articles without charging readers or their institutions for access.

Readers have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all articles published in Indonesia Berdaya .

This journal provides immediate open access to its content based on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

Publication Ethics

Indonesia Berdaya refers to the principles and guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Details of the guidelines and international standards can be found on the COPE website .

Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standards:

    Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

  2. Data Access and Retention:

    Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases, if practicable. Authors should also be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

  3. Originality and Plagiarism:

    Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works. If authors have used the work and/or words of others, these must be appropriately cited or quoted.

  4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication:

    An author should not generally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

  5. Acknowledgement of Sources:

    Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

  6. Authorship of the Paper:

    Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.

    Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the manuscript. All co-authors must have seen and approved the final version of the paper and agreed to its submission for publication.

  7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:

    All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

  8. Fundamental Errors in Published Works:

    When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

  9. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects:

    If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Duties of Editors

  1. Fair Play:

    Editors shall evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

  2. Confidentiality:

    The editor and editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

  3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:

    Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

  4. Publication Decisions:

    The journal's Editorial Board is responsible for deciding which submitted articles should be published. The validity of the work and its importance to researchers and readers must guide such decisions.

    Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's Editorial Board and applicable legal requirements concerning libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may consult other editors or reviewers when making publication decisions.

  5. Review of Manuscripts:

    Editors must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated for originality. The peer-review process must be organized and conducted fairly and appropriately.

    Editors should clearly explain the peer-review process in the information provided to authors and indicate which sections of the journal are peer reviewed. Editors should select qualified reviewers with sufficient expertise and avoid reviewers with conflicts of interest.

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:

    Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communications with authors, may also assist authors in improving their manuscripts.

  2. Promptness:

    Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that a prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and decline the review invitation.

  3. Standards of Objectivity:

    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  4. Confidentiality:

    Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:

    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

    Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the manuscript.

  6. Acknowledgement of Sources:

    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.

    Reviewers should also bring to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published work of which they have personal knowledge.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

Retraction

Papers published in Indonesia Berdaya will be considered for retraction under the following circumstances:

  1. There is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g., data fabrication) or honest error (e.g., miscalculation or experimental error).
  2. The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission, or justification (i.e., redundant publication).
  3. The publication constitutes plagiarism.
  4. The publication reports unethical research.

The retraction mechanism follows the Retraction Guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), available at: COPE Retraction Guidelines .

↑ Back to Table of Contents

Plagiarism Policy

Papers submitted to Indonesia Berdaya will be screened for plagiarism using CrossCheck/iThenticate plagiarism detection tools. The journal will reject manuscripts that are found to contain plagiarism or self-plagiarism.

Before manuscripts are submitted to peer reviewers, they will be checked for similarity by a member of the editorial team. Manuscripts submitted to Indonesia Berdaya must have a similarity level of less than 20%.

Plagiarism involves presenting another person's thoughts, ideas, or words as one's own without appropriate permission, attribution, acknowledgement, or citation. Plagiarism may take various forms, including literal copying, substantial copying, and improper paraphrasing.

To evaluate possible plagiarism, the journal considers the following situations:

  • Literal Copying:

    An author copies another author's work word for word, in whole or in part, without permission, acknowledgement, or appropriate citation of the original source. This practice may be identified by comparing the original source with the manuscript suspected of containing plagiarism.

  • Substantial Copying:

    An author reproduces a substantial part of another author's work without permission, acknowledgement, or appropriate citation. Substantial copying may be evaluated in terms of both quantity and quality. Quality refers to the relative importance of the copied material within the original work.

  • Improper Paraphrasing:

    Paraphrasing involves expressing ideas or information obtained from another source using different wording and sentence structures. This practice becomes unethical when the author fails to cite or acknowledge the original source. Improper paraphrasing can be particularly difficult to detect.

↑ Back to Table of Contents

Posting Your Article Policy

Authors should understand the article sharing and posting policies of Indonesia Berdaya at each stage of the article publication life cycle.

Prior to Submission to Indonesia Berdaya

Authors may post their articles anywhere at any time, including on preprint servers such as arXiv.org. This does not count as prior publication.

Upon Submission to Indonesia Berdaya

Authors may share or post their submitted version of the article (also known as the preprint) in the following ways:

  1. On the author's personal website or employer's website.
  2. On institutional or funder websites, if required.
  3. For the author's own classroom use.
  4. On Scholarly Collaboration Networks (SCNs) that are signatories to the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers' Sharing Principles: STM Sharing Principles .

The following statement should be included on the first page of the submitted article when it is first posted in any of the above outlets:

This work has been submitted to Indonesia Berdaya, https://ukinstitute.org/journals/ib , for possible publication.

Upon Acceptance to Indonesia Berdaya

If an author has previously posted the submitted version of the article in any of the following locations, the submitted version should be replaced with the accepted version of the article. No other changes may be made to the accepted manuscript.

  1. Author's personal website.
  2. Author's employer's website.
  3. arXiv.org.
  4. Funder's repository.

Final Published Article

  1. When the article is published, the posted version should be updated with a complete citation to the original publication in Indonesia Berdaya, including its Digital Object Identifier (DOI). The accepted version should be replaced with the final published version of the article, in accordance with the journal's sharing policy.

  2. The publication and sharing of the final article must comply with the journal's copyright notice, available at: Copyright Notice .

↑ Back to Table of Contents

SCOPUS Citation Analysis for Indonesia Berdaya

Citedness with various alternative journal titles as searching keywords in SCOPUS:

Notes: A secondary document is a document that has been extracted from a Scopus document reference list but is not directly available in the Scopus database because it is not indexed by Scopus.

↑ Back to Table of Contents