Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/Puu-Xv/2017 Terhadap Perlindungan Hak-Hak Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Dalam Prespektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Legal Consequences of Constitutional Court Decision Number 68/Puu-Xv/2017 on the Protection of the Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law from the Perspective of Criminal Law Reform)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.20251040Keywords:
Formulasi, Sistem Peradilam Pidana Anak, Pembaharuan Hukum PidanaAbstract
Pasal 99 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak sebagai realisasi dan implementasi upaya perlindungan anak yang dijamin oleh hukum Nasional dan Internasional. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hak-hak anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum saat ini dan untuk mengformulasikan Pasal 99 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/PUU-XV/2017. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan Undang-Undang dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa perlindungan hak-hak anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum saat ini terutama jaminan anak akan dikeluarkan dari tahanan setelah masa penahannya berakhir tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat. Sehingga memungkinkan aparat penegak hukum berperilaku semena-mena dalam menangani kasus anak. Kemudian untuk meminimalisir kemungkinan tersebut diperlukan reformulasi terhadap Pasal 99 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan memformulasikan Pasal yang juga memberikan pengaturan yang sama yaitu pemidanaan selama 2 (Dua) tahun tehadap lembaga pemasyarakatan, dalam hal ini Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak (LPKA) karena LPKA juga bagian dari sub sistem peradilan pidana anak.
Abstract. Article 99 of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as a realization and implementation of child protection efforts guaranteed by National and International law. This article aims to determine the form of protection of children's rights in conflict with the current law and to formulate Article 99 of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 68/PUU-XV/2017. This research method uses a normative legal research method with a Law and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the protection of children's rights in conflict with the current law, especially the guarantee that children will be released from detention after their detention period ends, does not have binding legal force. This allows law enforcement officers to behave arbitrarily in handling child cases. Then to minimize the possibility, it is necessary to reformulate Article 99 of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and formulate an Article that also provides the same regulation, namely a 2 (two) year sentence for correctional institutions, in this case the Special Child Development Institution (LPKA) because LPKA is also part of the juvenile criminal justice subsystem.
References
Bahari, H. F. (2015). Perlindungan Narapidana Anak di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan kelas IIB Jombang. Jurnal Recidive, 4(3), 337–344.
Barda Nawawi Arief, S. H. (2018). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan. Prenada Media.
Diamantina, A. (2013). Membangun Sistem Hukum Kewarganegaraan Republik Indonesia Yang Berprspektif Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(3), 329–335.
Efendi, J., Ibrahim, J., & Rijadi, P. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris.
Efendi, S., Siddiq, N. K., Yusuf, M. S., & Kusuma, W. (2022). Penyuluhan Hukum Pencegahan Pernikahan Usia Anak di Pondok Pesantren Al-Fathiyah Desa Lendang Are. Jurnal Mengabdi Dari Hati, 1(2), 69–74.
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hadikusumah, H. H. (2004). Pengantar Antropologi Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ibrahim, J. (2005). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Banyumedia Publishing.
Kuspitasari, Intan, & Rozah, Umi. (2017). Peran Kejaksaan Sebagai Eksekutor Pidana Mati di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Jurnal, 6(2), 1–16.
Laksana, Andri, W. (2017). Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 4(1), 57–64.
Manuhuruk, Tri Novita Sari. & Rochaeti, N. (2016). Perlindungan Hak Anak Korban Phedofelia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Studi Tentang Pennganan Kasus Kejahatan Seksual Terhadap Anak di Polrestabes Semarang). Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 12(1), 121–131.
Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Pradityo, R. (2016). Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.3.2016.319-330
Purnomo, B. (2018). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Anak Sebagai Pelaku Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Studi kasus di Polres Tegal). Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 13(1), 45–52.
Rochaeti, N. (2015). Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif dan Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 44(2), 150–160.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright and License Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read BIB's Posting Your Article Policy at https://www.ukinstitute.org/journals/ib/about/editorialPolicies#custom-3
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Journal of Indonesia Berdaya agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Journal of Indonesia Berdaya use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Journal of Indonesia Berdaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
