Implementing Lexical Choice Strategies for Writing Short Descriptive Texts at Pondok An Nahdloh, Selangor, Malaysia

Authors

  • Mujad Didien Afandi Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8759-4646
  • Savira Zaniar Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Nailul Authar Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Novi Rahmania Aquariza Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Edi Pujo Basuki Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Destita Shari Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.20261577

Keywords:

lexical choice, lexical diversity, lexical appropriateness, descriptive writing, linguistic development

Abstract

Limited vocabulary and inappropriate word selection often hinder junior high school students from producing effective English descriptive texts. To address this issue, a community service program entitled Teaching Lexical Choice for Writing Short Descriptive Texts at Pondok An Nahdloh, Selangor, Malaysia was conducted to improve students’ lexical diversity, lexical appropriateness, and linguistic development. The program involved fifteen Indonesian junior high school students and was implemented through a participatory training approach consisting of preparation, implementation, and evaluation stages. Instructional activities included introducing lexical choice, practicing synonym use, selecting contextually appropriate vocabulary, and writing short self-descriptive texts. Students completed writing tasks before and after the training, and their texts were evaluated using a lexical analysis rubric covering lexical diversity, lexical appropriateness, lexical density, register awareness, and overall lexical control. The findings showed substantial improvement in students’ lexical performance. The average total score increased from 12.07 (Fair) in the pre-writing task to 21.80 (Excellent) in the post-writing task. Students demonstrated greater vocabulary variation, more precise word selection, higher lexical density, and improved control of descriptive language. These findings indicate that lexical-choice instruction is an effective strategy for enhancing students’ writing quality and supporting linguistic development in English language learning.

Author Biography

Mujad Didien Afandi, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya

English Education Department

References

Ayadi, M. (2024). Exploring lexical complexity in scientific writing: A corpus-based study across disciplines. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), 421–433.

Bao, T., Zhao, Y., Mao, J., et al. (2025). Examining linguistic shifts in academic writing before and after the launch of ChatGPT: A study on preprint papers. Scientometrics.

Li, Y., & Lei, H. (2025). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 English academic writing: Convergent and divergent usage. SAGE Open, 15(2).

Maamuujav, U., Olson, C. B., & Chung, H. (2021). Syntactic and lexical features of adolescent L2 students’ academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100822.

Müngen, A. A. (2023). Exploring lexical richness in English-language theses across disciplines: A comparative analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 12(2), 459–468.

Webb, S. (2018). Vocabulary learning and language teaching: Current trends and future directions. Language Teaching Research, 22(4), 1–15.

Zhang, B. (2017). Vocabulary and writing performance among EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 95–107.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Afandi, M. D., Zaniar, S., Authar, N., Aquariza, N. R., Basuki, E. P., & Shari, D. (2026). Implementing Lexical Choice Strategies for Writing Short Descriptive Texts at Pondok An Nahdloh, Selangor, Malaysia. Indonesia Berdaya, 7(3), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.20261577

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check