Analisis Putusan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Kasus Korupsi Ditinjau Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Progresif (Studi Putusan Nomor 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2023566

Keywords:

Progressive Law, Corruption Case, Judge's Consideration

Abstract

This study aims to examine the basis for judges' considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on Decision Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT DKI, as well as reviewing the application of criminal sanctions against perpetrators in Decision Number 10/Pis.Sus-TPK/2021/PT DKI reviewed under progressive law. The research was carried out by applying normative legal research methods, using statutory, conceptual and case approaches. From the results of the research, it shows that both the juridical and non-juridical considerations above, the authors consider that the basis for the judge's considerations is not in accordance with the principle of equality before the law and does not consider the status of the defendant as a law enforcer but instead commits a criminal act of corruption. In the concept of progressive law, judges can actually be more flexible in giving decisions, namely by making discoveries or breakthroughs related to what according to him is currently irrelevant. However, the application of the non-criminal sanction against Attorney Pinangki in Decision Number 10/Pis.Sus-TPK/2021/PT DKI if viewed based on progressive law has not been fulfilled. Because the reduction in prison sentences by the Panel of Judges was not matched by an increase in fines, and in considering the imposition of criminal sanctions, the Panel of Judges only seemed to focus on the gender status of the accused.

References

Ahmad, K. 2012. Filsafat Kebebasan Hakim. Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta.

Amiruddin dan Asikin, H. Z. 2006. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). “Persentase Penduduk Miskin Maret 2022 turun menjadi 9,54 persen. Diakses di https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2022/07/15/1930/persentase-penduduk-miskin-maret-2022-turun-menjadi-9-54-persen.html#:~:text=Garis%20Kemiskinan%20pada%20Maret%202022,(25%2C92%20persen).

BBC News Indonesia. (2020). “Jaksa Pinangki: Kejagung tetapkan pengusaha Andi Irfan Jaya sebagai tersangka kasus dugaan suap Djoko Tjandra”. Diakses di https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-53734170.

Detik News. (2009). “Mencuri 3 Buah Kakao, Nenek Minah Dihukum 1 Bulan 15 Hari”. Diakses di https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1244955/mencuri-3-buah-kakao-nenek-minah-dihukum-1-bulan-15-hari.

Fauzia, A., Hamdani, F., & Octavia, D. G. R. (2021). The Revitalization of the Indonesian Legal System in the Order of Realizing the Ideal State Law. Progressive Law Review, 3(1).

Feri, S. (2021). “Ini Tanggapan KY Terkait Pro dan Kontra Putusan Banding Jaksa Pinangki”. Diakses di https://monitorindonesia.com/2021/06/ini-tanggapan-ky-terkait-pro-dan-kontra-putusan-banding-jaksa-pinangki.

Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2021). “Laporan Hasil Eksaminasi Publik Putusan Nomor 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI Terdakwa Pinangki Sirna Malasari”. Diakses di https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Eksaminasi%20Putusan%20Pinangki%20Sirna%20Malasari.pdf.

Indonesian Corruption Watch. (2021). “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi”. Diakses di https://antikorupsi.org/id/category/laporan-akhir-tahun.

Irianto, S., et.al. 2017. Problematika Hakim dalam Ranah Hukum, Pengadilan, dan Masyarakat di Indonesia: Studi Sosio-Legal. Pusat Analisis dan Layanan Informasi Komisi Yudisial. Jakarta.

Komisi Yudisial. (2020). “KY Terus Dorong Upaya Pencegahan Korupsi”. Diakses di https://komisiyudisial.go.id/frontend/pers_release_detail/178/ky-terus-dorong-%20upaya-pencegahan-korupsi.

Lamintang, T. 2018. Kejahatan Jabatan dan Kejahatan Jabatan Tertentu Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Maharani, T. (2021). “Dagelan Kasus Pinangki, Ketika Perantara Suap Dihukum Lebih Berat dari Jaksa Korup". Diakses di https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/07/06/20584121/dagelan-kasus-pinangki-ketika-perantara-suap-dihukum-lebih-berat-dari-jaksa?page=all.

Mahfud MD., M., et.al. 2011. Satjipto Rahardjo dan Hukum Progresif Urgensi dan Kritik. Epistema Institute dan HuMa. Jakarta.

Moeljatno. 2018. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Muliadi, A. 2012. Makalah Politik Hukum. SAP S-2 Universitas Jayabaya. Jakarta.

Nuryadi, D. (2016). Teori Hukum Progresif dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 1(2).

Rahardjo, S. (2004b). Menghadapi Kemelut dengan Membangun suatu Kultur Berhukum yang Baru. Makalah, dalam Seminar “Mengurai Benang Kusut Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia”, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang.

Rahardjo, S. 2004a. Ilmu Hukum: Pencarian, Pembebasan, dan Pencerahan. Muhammadiyah Press University. Malang.

Rahardjo, S. 2007. Biarkan Hukum Mengalir (Catatan Kritis Tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum). Penerbit Buku Kompas. Jakarta.

Rampadio, H., Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). The urgency of arrangement regarding illicit enrichment in indonesia in order to eradication of corruption crimes by corporations. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 9(2).

Reda, E. M., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2020). Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(2).

Sambas, N., dan Mahmud, A. (2019). Model Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara melalui Pidana Uang Pengganti. Lex LATA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 9(1).

Syahbana, R., et.al. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Pejabat Negara Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 12/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2018/Pn.Mdn. Usu Law Journal, 7(7).

Syarif, M. 2020. Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta.

Usman, S. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Sosiologi Hukum. Pustaka Belajar. Yogyakarta.

Utama, A. (2020). “Kasus Djoko Tjandra: Buron kasus korupsi kembali ke Indonesia, Kejagung dikritik tak aktif sebar informasi soal buron”. Diakses di https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-53322570.

Widyakso, R. (2015). “Pilar-Pilar Hukum Progresif: Menyelami Pemikiran Satjipto Rahardjo”. Diakses di https://pa-semarang.go.id/images/stories/Artikel/RESUME%20BUKU%20PILAR-PILAR%20HUKUM%20PROGRESIF.PDF.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-02

How to Cite

Handayani, T. A., & Pramono, A. (2023). Analisis Putusan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Kasus Korupsi Ditinjau Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Progresif (Studi Putusan Nomor 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI). Indonesia Berdaya, 4(4), 1359–1372. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2023566

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2023)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright and License Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read BIB's Posting Your Article Policy at https://www.ukinstitute.org/journals/ib/about/editorialPolicies#custom-3
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Journal of Indonesia Berdaya agrees to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Journal of Indonesia Berdaya use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

 

Creative Commons License
Journal of Indonesia Berdaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.