Keabsahan Pemeriksaan Saksi secara Bersama-Sama di Persidangan sebagai Perwujudan Asas Cepat Sederhana dan Biaya Ringan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2024862Keywords:
Validity, Witness Examination, Fast Principle, Low Cost PrincipleAbstract
To implement criminal law, it is necessary to take steps to maintain the legal order of society. This method is known as criminal procedural law. The purpose of the Criminal Procedure Code is to seek and obtain or at least approach the material truth, the complete truth. The Indonesian criminal justice system consists of the police, prosecutors, district courts and correctional institutions as law enforcement officers. The four organs are closely related and limit each other. With the aim of being able to explain an alleged criminal act, evidence is needed to support that a crime has occurred. Evidence is directly or indirectly related to the crime. Direct evidence includes victims who suffered physically or mentally, including witnesses who saw or heard that a crime had occurred. Examination of witnesses has an important role in criminal proceedings by following the principles of unnus tetis nulus tetis (witnesses are not witnesses) and testimonium de auditu (statements of other people are not valid evidence). In the process of examining witnesses, many things go together. This is possible because of the principle of justice which is fast, easy and cheap. Because based on this principle, both the public prosecutor and the judge are obliged to review the defendant's case as soon as possible, especially for defendants who are in detention. That if the witness examination is carried out simultaneously. This can be done because of the principle of a fast, simple and low-cost trial, but how can the validity of witnesses who are examined jointly at trial be known, the implementation of witness examinations between mitigating and aggravating ones is not directly examined together, but separately and what distinguishes it is the time when the examination is carried out because it involves the validity and provision of interrelated information. In this study the authors used a normative method using a statutory approach and the legal materials used were primary legal materials, namely laws and regulations related to the issues to be discussed and secondary legal materials obtained from all publications on law including books and, law dictionaries.
References
Arliman, L. S. (2018). Peranan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum di dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum di Indonesia. Soumatera Law Review, 1(1).
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Hukum Acara Pengajuan Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Sekertariat Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkama konstitusi RI.
Bahri, S. (2012). Beban Pembuktian dalam Beberapa Praktik Peradilan. Bekasi: Gramata Publishing.
Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). Pembaharuan Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Korporasi Melalui Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(7), 497–519.
Hamdani, F. (2021). Eksistensi Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor dalam Konteks Hukum di Era Modern. In A. Hariri (Ed.), Penegakan Korupsi dan Pembaharuan Hukum di Indonesia (pp. 56–67). Surabaya: UM Surabaya Publishing.
Hamzah, A. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Handayani, T. A., & Pramono, A. (2023). Analisis Putusan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Kasus Korupsi Ditinjau Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Progresif (Studi Putusan Nomor 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI). Indonesia Berdaya, 4(4), 1359–1372.
Harahap, M. Y. (2005). Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, M. Y. (2010). Pembahasan, Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Nurhayati, Fauzia, A., Hamdani, F., & Ghani, N. binti A. (2023). Seeking Substantive Justice: The Progressive Spirit of Law on Sexual Violence Crimes. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 23(3), 556–572. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.3.3749
Pramono, A. (2024). Penerapan Hukum Pidana Materiil terhadap Pelaku Penyertaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Kasus Putusan PN Tipikor Banda Aceh. Indonesia Berdaya, 5(3), 783–796.
Prodjodikoro, W. (1977). Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Sumur Bandung.
Rampadio, H., Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). The urgency of arrangement regarding illicit enrichment in indonesia in order to eradication of corruption crimes by corporations. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 9(2), 225–241.
Sasangka, Hari, & Rosita, L. (2003). Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Sasangka, Heri, Rosita, L., & Hadiwijono, A. (1996). Penyidikan, Penahanan, Penuntutan dan Prapradilan. Bangil: AM Print.
Soraya, J., & Refangga, G. S. (2024). Peran Kepolisian dalam Mencegah Peredaran Gelap Narkotika dalam Perspektif Kriminologi. Indonesia Berdaya, 5(3), 869–878.
Wahid, A., Sulbadana, Nurqalbi, V., & Hamdani, F. (2022). The Effects of Decision Number: 15/PUU-XIX/2021 of the Constitutional Court on Indonesia’s Money Laundering Law Enforcement. European Journal of Law and Political Science, 1(5), 42–47.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright and License Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read BIB's Posting Your Article Policy at https://www.ukinstitute.org/journals/ib/about/editorialPolicies#custom-3
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Journal of Indonesia Berdaya agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Journal of Indonesia Berdaya use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
Journal of Indonesia Berdaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
