Driving Style, Psychological Well-being, and Road Safety Behavior of Drivers: A Critical Review

Authors

  • Garima Singh Department of psychology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur, India
  • Anubhuti Dubey Department of psychology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur, India http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-4980

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.7311472025

Keywords:

Driving style Attitude towards road safety, psychological well-being, Road safety behavior, Traffic psychology

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between psychological well-being and driving style is essential for addressing public health issues related to road safety. Road accidents impose substantial economic, social, and emotional burdens. This review aims to (1) identify psychological and behavioral determinants of driving behavior, (2) explore how driving style moderates the link between psychological well-being and road safety behavior, and (3) evaluate interventions that promote safer driving outcomes. A systematic review of 30 empirical studies (20 international, 10 Indian) published between 2000 and 2025 was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and ResearchGate. Studies were selected based on relevance, empirical rigor, and focus on psychological factors in driving. The review was framed using the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Stress-Strain Model. Findings reveal that psychological distress (e.g., stress, fatigue) contributes to aggressive and risky driving, while higher well-being correlates with defensive, safer driving styles and improved risk perception. Defensive driving mitigates the adverse impact of poor mental health on behavior. Promising interventions include stress management training, psychological education, and real-time driver feedback systems. Future research should focus on culturally adapted, evidence-based interventions targeting high-risk groups, supporting integration of psychological screening and mental health strategies into driver education and road safety policy.

Author Biographies

Garima Singh, Department of psychology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur

Garima Singh is a PhD research scholar in the Department of Psychology at Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India. She is a UGC-NET qualified scholar and a gold medalist in her postgraduate studies in Psychology. Her research focuses on the relationship between driving style, attitude towards road safety, and risk perception with road safety behavior and psychological well-being of automobile drivers in India. She has presented her work at both national and international conferences. Her broader academic interests include traffic psychology and applied social psychology.

Anubhuti Dubey, Department of psychology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur

Anubhuti Dubey is a Professor of Psychology and Dean of Students' Welfare at DDU Gorakhpur University. She has authored five books, published 60+ research papers, and supervised 15 Ph.D. scholars. Her expertise lies in Health Psychology, Positive Psychology, and Counseling, and she is the Editor of ‘Mind and Society’. She has been honoured as Shakti Yodha by the U.P. Government for her contributions

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Amoadu, Y. D., Kusi-Appiah, E., & Mensah, K. E. (2024). The relationship between job demands, psychological well-being, and driving safety: A study of long-distance bus drivers in Ghana. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 29(1), 12–25.

Boardman, J., & Grimes, R. (2024). Psychological distress and its impact on risky driving behaviors: A longitudinal study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 96, 53–68.

Brown, L., & Davis, P. (2022). Risky driving behaviors and road safety: A meta-analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 166, 106561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106561

Cordellieri, P., Baralla, F., Ferlazzo, F., Sgalla, R., Piccardi, L., &Giannini, A. M. (2016). Gender effects in young road users on road safety attitudes, behaviors, and risk perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1412.

Deery, H. A. (1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 30(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(99)00018-3

Dubey, A., & Singh, R.(2024).Driving style, psychological well-being, and road safety behavior among Indian drivers: A literature review. Journal of Traffic Psychology and Road Safety, 12(1), 45–58.

Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G., &Pungillo, G. (2017). How to define the accident risk level of car drivers by combining objective and subjective measures of driving style. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 49, 29–38.

Evans, L. (2004). Traffic safety. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Science Serving Society.

Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1974). Type A behavior and your heart. New York, NY: Knopf.

Goyal, T., Sharma, A., & Kaushal, S. (2022). Awareness and practices regarding road safety rules among drivers in a North Indian city: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 9(5), 2015–2020. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20221232

Harré, N., Field, J., & Kirkwood, B. (1996). Gender differences and areas of common concern in road safety education for young children. Journal of Safety Research, 27(3), 153–163.

Hasan, M. M., & Hossain, M. I. (2021). Psychological well-being and risky driving behavior: Evidence from a developing country. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijpbs.20211102.01

Isler, R. B., & Newland, R. L. (2017). Happiness orientation and self-reported driving incidents among New Zealand drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.009

Jessor, R., Turbin, M. S., & Costa, F. M. (1995).Predicting developmental change in risky driving: The transition to young adulthood.Applied Developmental Science, 1(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0101_2

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065

Kumar, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2017). Risky driving behavior among Indian youth: Role of personality traits and peer pressure. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1201112

Lund, I. O., &Rundmo, T. (2009). Cross-cultural comparisons of traffic safety, risk perception, attitudes, and behaviour. Safety Science, 47(4), 547–553.

Mauricio, D. (2024). Factors, prediction, and explainability of vehicle accident risk due to driving behavior through machine learning: A systematic literature review (2013–2023). Computation, 12(7), 131.

Mesken, J., Hagenzieker, M. P., &Rothengatter, J. A. (2015). Defensive driving and psychological well-being: The interplay of mental health and road safety behavior. Safety Science, 76, 85–92.

Michael, J., Singh, S. P., & Batra, A. (2014). Risky driving behavior among young drivers in India: Psychosocial factors and its implications. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 40(2), 293–299.

Nguyen, H., & Tran, T. (2024). Automated road defect and anomaly detection for traffic safety: A systematic review. Sensors, 24(7), 2101. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072101

Nikumb, V. B., Nandimath, V. A., & Jadhav, S. M. (2013).A study of helmet use among two-wheeler riders in an urban area. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 38(1), 1–4.

Nordfjærn, T., Šimunović, L., & Rundmo, T. (2012). Culture related to traffic safety, risk perception and accident involvement in Croatia, Norway and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Safety Science, 50(5), 1148–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.003

Odoom, R., Odoom, P. T., &Essandoh, M. (2023). Perceptions underlying road safety behaviours of drivers in urban Ghana – A health-belief and planned behavior perspective. Journal of Social Marketing, 13(4), 631–657.

Özkan, T., &Lajunen, T. (2020). Reckless driving and psychological well-being: The role of thrill-seeking and impulsivity. Journal of Safety Research, 73, 124–131.

Pešić, A., Stephens, A. N., Newnam, S., Čičević, S., Pešić, D., &Trifunović, A. (2022). Youth perceptions and attitudes towards road safety in Serbia. Systems, 10(5), 191.

Ramesh, R., & Kumar, P.(2021). Occupational stress and mental health among commercial vehicle drivers in urban India: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 25(2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_85_20

Rastogi, R., Mehta, A., & Tripathi, N. (2020). Personality traits and safety rule compliance among Indian university students. Indian Journal of Psychological Science, 12(2), 75–83.

Rhodes, N., &Pivik, K. (2011). Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 923–931.

Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403

Rowden, P., Matthews, G., Watson, B., & Biggs, H. (2011). The relative impact of work-related stress, life stress, and driving environment stress on driving outcomes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(4), 1332–1340.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Sagberg, F., Selpi, Bianchi Piccinini, G. F., &Engström, J. (2015). A review of research on driving styles and road safety. Human Factors, 57(7), 1248–1275.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: Free Press.

Shahar, A., Bar-David, S., &Shani, M. (2010). Risk perception and risk-taking among young novice drivers: The effects of driving style and parents’ level of involvement. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(6), 1949–1959.

Simons-Morton, B. G., Lerner, N., & Singer, J. (2005). The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(6), 973–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.014

Smith, A., & Gupta, R. (2023). Impact of road conditions and traffic situations on driving behavior: A systematic review. Journal of Safety Research, 84, 120–136.

Sticher, G. (2005). An investigation of attitudes towards risk factors, personal driving ability, and road safety information among rural and remote road users. Conference of Australian Institutes of Transport Research.

Sullman, M. J. M., Stephens, A. N., & Yong, M. (2017). Driving style, psychological wellbeing, and stress: A bidirectional relationship? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 47, 65–74.

Sundar, S., Krishnan, R., & Rajkumar, R. P. (2019). Mental health status and work-related stress among auto-rickshaw drivers in a South Indian city. Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour, 24(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_3_19

Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., & Skvirsky, V. (2016). The multidimensional driving style inventory a decade later: Review of the literature and re-evaluation of the scale. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 93, 179–188.

Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). The multidimensional driving style inventory: Scale construct and validation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(3), 323–332.

Taylor, J. E., & Dorn, L. (2006). Stress, fatigue, health, and risk of road traffic accidents among professional drivers: The contribution of physical inactivity. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 71–91.

Ulleberg,P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes, and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41(5), 427–443.

Useche, S. A., Cendales, B., & Montoro, L.(2020). Work stress and health problems in professional drivers: The moderating role of driving-related variables. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 68, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.014

Wilde, G. J. S. (2001). Target risk 2: A new psychology of safety and health. Toronto, Canada: PDE Publications.

Yuen, K. S., Koppel, S., & Muir, C. (2014). The influence of risk perception and psychological distress on young drivers’ risky driving behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.007

Zhang, L., Qian, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023). Aggressive driving and its implications for road safety: The role of psychological well-being. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 12(2), 91–104.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Singh, G., & Dubey, A. (2025). Driving Style, Psychological Well-being, and Road Safety Behavior of Drivers: A Critical Review. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 7(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.7311472025

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025)

Section

Literature Review

Citation Check

License

Copyright Policy

Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.

  • Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
  • By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  • This license permits others to:
    • Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
    • Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
    • As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
  • Authors may:
    • Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
    • Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.

Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication

To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:

  • Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
  • Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
  • Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
  • Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
  • Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
    • The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
    • Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
    • Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
  • Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
  • Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.