Trait Anxiety and Fictional Exposure: How Movie Preferences Shape Psychological Resilience and Pandemic Preparedness

Authors

  • Kaneez Fatima Dar Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee, India
  • Manish Kumar Asthana Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.7412602025

Keywords:

Pandemic, Resilience, Preparedness, Trait anxiety, Movies

Abstract

People differ in their ability to cope with stressful situations. The pandemic outbreak put the world under a lot of stress and challenges in the form of its prevention and its repercussions. People with different levels of trait anxiety cope differently with stressful situations. This study examines the association of trait anxiety with pandemic psychological resilience and pandemic preparedness. People around the world enjoy engaging with fictional experiences. One reason why people enjoy such experiences is that they provide people with simulations of real events that can act as a source of information. The current study investigated the relationship between movie genres and psychological resilience and preparedness towards the pandemic. We conducted an online study with 120 participants, mean age (SD) =18.36 (.73) years. The data was collected through convenience and snowball sampling methods. The participants filled out demographic questionnaires, State-Trait Anxiety questionnaire, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, movie genre preference questionnaire, pandemic psychological resilience scale, and pandemic preparedness scale. The results indicated a negative interaction between trait anxiety and cognitive reappraisal, a positive interaction between trait anxiety and positive resilience, and a positive interaction between trait anxiety and psychological distress towards the pandemic. Our results showed that certain movie genre preferences are significantly correlated with positive resilience and psychological distress towards the pandemic.

Author Biographies

Kaneez Fatima Dar, Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee

Kaneez Fatima Dar is a doctoral student at the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. Her PhD research focuses on higher cognitive processes involved in emotion regulation, particularly the role of cognitive reappraisal and inhibitory control in enhancing the extinction of conditioned fear responses. She employs a range of physiological, cognitive, and affective measures in her investigations.

Manish Kumar Asthana, Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee

Dr. Manish Kumar Asthana obtained his doctoral degree in 2013 at the University of Wuerzburg, Germany. He is an associate professor at the Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, IIT-Roorkee. He has conducted research mainly on associative fear learning and its modulation. The development and introduction of novel methods such as behavioural, transcranial direct current stimulation, and genetic is a particular focus of his work. Other exciting research fields are investigations of early biomarkers for anxiety and related disorders, e.g., startle, skin conductance response (SCR), heart-rate variability, blood pressure, etc., for assessing early detection of anxiety or related disorders.

References

AlQarni, A. M., Elfaki, A., Abdel Wahab, M. M., Aljehani, Y., ALKhunaizi, A. A., Othman, S. A., & AlShamlan, R. A. (2023). Psychological Resilience, Anxiety, and Well-Being of Health Care Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Volume 16, 1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S403681

Artuch-Garde, R., González-Torres, M. D. C., De La Fuente, J., Vera, M. M., Fernández-Cabezas, M., & López-García, M. (2017). Relationship between Resilience and Self-regulation: A Study of Spanish Youth at Risk of Social Exclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00612

Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03

Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cfiffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Britton, J. C., Lissek, S., Grillon, C., Norcross, M. A., & Pine, D. S. (2011). Development of anxiety: The role of threat appraisal and fear learning. Depression and Anxiety, 28(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20733

Clasen, M. (2017). Why horror seduces (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.

Clasen, M., Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J., & Johnson, J. A. (2020). Horror, personality, and threat simulation: A survey on the psychology of scary media. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000152

Cho, S., White, K. H., Yang, Y., & Soto, J. A. (2019). The role of trait anxiety in the selection of emotion regulation strategies and subsequent effectiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.035

Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 287, 112934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934

Espejo, E. P., Hammen, C., & Brennan, P. A. (2012). Elevated Appraisals of the Negative Impact of Naturally Occurring Life Events: A Risk Factor for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9552-0

Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524

Gross, J.J., & John, O.P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.

Jean Francois, G., Carr, D., Meynadasy, M. A., & Sachs-Ericsson, N. (2023). Prediction of COVID-19-related distress: The role of anxiety and resiliency. Aging & Mental Health, 27(3), 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2084714

Kerr, M., Siegle, G. J., & Orsini, J. (2019). Voluntary arousing negative experiences (VANE): Why we like to be scared. Emotion, 19(4), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000470

Kayikcioglu, O., Bilgin, S., Seymenoglu, G., & Deveci, A. (2017). State and Trait Anxiety Scores of Patients Receiving Intravitreal Injections. Biomedicine Hub, 2(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000478993

Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.

Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw Hill.

McCleskey, J., & Gruda, D. (2021). Risk-taking, resilience, and state anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A coming of (old) age story. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110485

Mestre, J. M., Núñez-Lozano, J. M., Gómez-Molinero, R., Zayas, A., & Guil, R. (2017). Emotion Regulation Ability and Resilience in a Sample of Adolescents from a Suburban Area. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01980

Morin, O., Acerbi, A., & Sobchuk, O. (2019). Why people die in novels: Testing the ordeal simulation hypothesis. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0267-0

Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x

Madhushani, K. H. S. (2025). The Role of Fantasy Literature in Providing Psychological Escapism and its Impact on Teenage Readers’ Mental Health in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 951–957. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar674

Scrivner, C., Johnson, J. A., Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J., & Clasen, M. (2021). Pandemic practice: Horror fans and morbidly curious individuals are more psychologically resilient during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110397

Scrivner, C., & Christensen, K. A. (2021). Scaring away anxiety: Therapeutic avenues for horror fiction to enhance treatment for anxiety symptoms [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7uh6f

Setiawati, Y., Wahyuhadi, J., Joestandari, F., Maramis, M. M., & Atika, A. (2021). Anxiety and Resilience of Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Volume 14, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S276655

Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P.R. and Jacobs, G.A. (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto.

Samson, A. C., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Humour as emotion regulation: The differential consequences of negative versus positive humour. Cognition & Emotion, 26(2), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.585069

Usher, K., Bhullar, N., & Jackson, D. (2020). Life in the pandemic: Social isolation and mental health. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(15–16), 2756–2757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15290Wadsworth, L. P., & Hayes-Skelton, S. A. (2020). Exploring perceived control, a low-control task, and a brief acceptance intervention in a low and high transdiagnostic anxiety sample. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 35, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npbr.2019.11.001

Weger, M., & Sandi, C. (2018). High anxiety trait: A vulnerable phenotype for stress-induced depression. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 87, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.012

Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Lyu, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., & Luo, J. (2021). The Influence of COVID-19 on the Well-Being of People: Big Data Methods for Capturing the Well-Being of Working Adults and Protective Factors Nationwide. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 681091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.681091

Downloads

Published

2025-11-14

How to Cite

Dar, K. F., & Asthana, M. K. (2025). Trait Anxiety and Fictional Exposure: How Movie Preferences Shape Psychological Resilience and Pandemic Preparedness. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 7(4), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.7412602025

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025)

Section

Original Research Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright Policy

Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.

  • Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
  • By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  • This license permits others to:
    • Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
    • Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
    • As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
  • Authors may:
    • Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
    • Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.

Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication

To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:

  • Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
  • Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
  • Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
  • Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
  • Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
    • The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
    • Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
    • Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
  • Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
  • Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.