Email this article 
(UIN Sunan kalijaga, Indonesia)*corresponding author
AbstractBeberapa tantangan dalam penelitian kuantitatif yang masih belum bisa diatasi selama ini adalah validitas ekologis pada penelitian eksperimen dan recall bias pada penelitian survey. Guna menjawab permasalahan tersebut, penulis tertarik dengan penggunaan Diary Study/ Experience Sampling Method (ESM). ESM merupakan metode pengumpulan data secara berkala yang bersifat real-time di latar alami partisipan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode systematic literature review untuk menganalisis definisi, prosedur serta kelebihan dan kekurangan ESM. Berdasar hasil telaah pustaka, ESM diketahui dapat menggambarkan proses inter maupun intra-individu, memiliki validitas ekologis yang bagus, meminimalisasi recall bias dan mendapatkan data yang beragam. Sayangnya, penggunaan ESM masih terkendala beberapa hal seperti self-selction bias, atrisi, motivasi serta kompleksnya managemen maupun teknik analisis data yang digunakan. Hal-hal yang dapat mengatasi permasalahan tersebut telah didiskusikan.
Abstract. Some existing challenges in quantitative research are ecological validity in experimental psychology and recall bias in the survey study. In order to answer those questions, the author was interested in the experience sampling method (ESM) or diary study. ESM is a research method that collects data frequently in participants’ real-world settings. This study performed a systematic literature review to analyze the definition, procedures, as well as the benefits and drawbacks of ESM. According to the literature review, ESM is known to describe both intra-individual (within-subject) and extra-individual (between-subject) processes, has better ecological validity compared to experimental research, can minimize recall bias, and was able to obtain various data. Unfortunately, there were some drawbacks such as self-selection bias, attrition, motivation, also the complexity of its data management and analysis. Some procedures to minimize those issues have been discussed. Keywordsdiary study; experience sampling method; metode penelitian, penelitian kuantitatif; research methods; quantitative studies
|
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.022.12200007 |
Article metricsRead: 26818 | Download: 20373 |
Cite |
Full Text Download
|
References
Adila, W., Rinjani, M., & Cinderela, P. (2019). Tingkat pengetahuan remaja tentang personal hygiene. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 1(2), 59–66.
Barrett, L. F., & Barrett, S. P. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology, 19(2), 175–185.
Battista, S. R., Mackinnon, S. P., Sherry, S. B., Barrett, S. P., MacNevin, P. D., & Stewart, S. H. (2015). Does alcohol reduce social anxiety in daily life? A 22-day experience sampling study. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(6), 508–528. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2015.34.6.508
Conner, T. S., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2003). A practical guide to experience sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 53–78.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Gotlin, M. J., Kingery, M. T., Baron, S. L., McCafferty, J., Jazrawi, L. M., & Meislin, R. J. (2020). Recall Bias in Retrospective Assessment of Preoperative Patient-Reported American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(6), 1471–1475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520913491
Hicks, J., Ramanathan, N., Falaki, H., Longstaff, B., Parameswaran, K., Monibi, M., … Estrin, D. (2010). AndWellness: an open mobile system for activity and experience sampling. In Proceedings of Wireless Health 2010 (pp. 34–43). https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248705
Hipp, L., Bünning, M., Munnes, S., & Sauermann, A. (2020). Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19 studies. Survey Research Methods, 14(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7741
Juslin, P. N., Liljeström, S., Västfjäll, D., Barradas, G., & Silva, A. (2008). An Experience Sampling Study of Emotional Reactions to Music: Listener, Music, and Situation. Emotion, 8(5), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013505
Kashdan, T. B., & Farmer, A. S. (2014). Differentiating Emotions Across Contexts: Comparing Adults with and without Social Anxiety Disorder Using Random, Social Interaction, and Daily Experience Sampling. Emotion, 14(3), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035796.Differentiating
Kelly, J., Gooding, P., Pratt, D., Ainsworth, J., Welford, M., & Tarrier, N. (2012). Intelligent real-time therapy: Harnessing the power of machine learning to optimise the delivery of momentary cognitivebehavioural interventions. Journal of Mental Health, 21(4), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2011.638001
Lerner, R. M., & Schmid Callina, K. (2014). Relational developmental systems theories and the ecological validity of experimental designs: Commentary on freund and isaacowitz. Human Development, 56(6), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357179
Muarif, A. K., & Adiyanti, M. G. (2020). Emotional Intelligence training untuk mereduksi burnout pada anggota Kepolisian Republik Indonesia. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 2(1), 13–24.
Myers, O. E., Saunders, C. D., & Birjulin, A. A. (2004). Emotional Dimensions of Watching Zoo Animals: An Experience Sampling Study Building on Insights from Psychology. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00127.x
Myin-Germeys, I., Peeters, F., Havermans, R., Nicolson, N. A., DeVries, M. W., Delespaul, P., & Van Os, J. (2003). Emotional reactivity to daily life stress in psychosis and affective disorder: An experience sampling study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 107(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.02025.x
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
O’Toole, M. S., Jensen, M. B., Fentz, H. N., Zachariae, R., & Hougaard, E. (2014). Emotion differentiation and emotion regulation in high and low socially anxious individuals: An experience-sampling study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(4), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9611-2
Ottenstein, C., & Lischetzke, T. (2020). Recall bias in emotional intensity ratings: investigating person-level and event-level predictors. Motivation and Emotion, 44(3), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09796-4
Palmier-Claus, J. E., Myin-Germeys, I., Barkus, E., Bentley, L., Udachina, A., Delespaul, P. A. E. G., … Dunn, G. (2011). Experience sampling research in individuals with mental illness: Reflections and guidance. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 123(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01596.x
Prasandi, A., & Diana, H. (2020). Perempuan Dewasa di Kecamatan Sukoharjo Kabupaten Pringsewu. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 2(1), 25–39.
Schmuckler, M. (2001). What is Ecological Validity? Infancy, 2(4), 419–436.
Scollon, Christie N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Scollon, C. N. (2003). Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023605205115
Scollon, Christie Napa, Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2005). An experience sampling and cross-cultural investigation of the relation between pleasant and unpleasant affect. Cognition and Emotion, 19(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000076
Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. W. (2009). Using Experience Sampling Methods/Ecological Momentary Assessment (ESM/EMA) in Clinical Assessment and Clinical Research: Introduction to the Special Section. Psychol Assess, 21(4), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00091Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Denisa Apriliawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All publications by the Utan Kayu Publishing [e-ISSN: 2715-4807, p-ISSN: 2715-4785] is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.