High School Students' Motivation and Engagement in Online Learning

(1) * Lativa Tara Mail (Psychology Department, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia)
(2) Izzanil Hidayati Mail (Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia)
(3) Meria Susanti Mail (Universitas Andalas, Indonesia)
*corresponding author

Abstract


This study aims to determine the effect of motivation toward student engagement of high school students in Padang city in online learning. The quantitative research method of simple linear regression analysis was used in this study. This study included 331 high school students who participated in online learning using random sampling techniques.  The Motivated Strategies and Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) and the Student Engagement Scale were applied to this study. Reliability on the motivation scale was .922 and the student engagement scale was .926. The results of this study indicate that motivation has a significant effect on student engagement in high school students in Padang City in online learning. This can be seen from the significance value of .000 (p less than .05) and the R-square coefficient (R2) value of .545.  It can be concluded that motivation influences student engagement by 55%, while the remaining (45%) is influenced by other factors not investigated in this study.

Keywords


motivation; student engagement; online learning

   

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.424062022
      

Article metrics

10.47679/jopp.424062022 Abstract views : 501 | PDF views : 459

   

Cite

   

Full Text

Download

References


Amalia, R., & Hendriani, W. (2017). Pengaruh Resiliensi Akademik dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Student Engagement pada Santri Mukim Pondok Pesantren Nurul Islam Karangcempaka Sumenep. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Dan Perkembangan, 6, 1–13.

Anugrahana, A. (2020). Hambatan , Solusi dan Harapan : Pembelajaran Daring Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Oleh Guru Sekolah Dasar. 282–289. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i3.p282-289

Dhull, I., & Sakshi, M. (2017). Online Learning. International Education & Research Journal [IERJ], 3, 32–34

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: the Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning Journal (OLJ), 19(4), 143. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079585

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement Potential of the Concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Galugu, N. S., & Amriani, A. (2019). Motivasi Berprestasi Sebagai Mediasi Pada Hubungan Antara Dukungan Sosial dan Keterlibatan Siswa di Sekolah. JURKAM: Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa, 3(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.31100/jurkam.v3i2.414

Gibbs, R., & Poskitt, J. (2010). Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (year 7-10): A literature review. Report to the Ministry of Education. In Ministry of Education, New Zealand. www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Penyesuaian Keputusan Bersama Empat Menteri tentang Panduan Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Pengelola Web Kemdikbud. Retrieved from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/08/penyesuaian-keputusan-bersama-empat-menteri-tentang-panduan-pembelajaran-di-masa-pandemi-covid19

Martin, A. (2010). Girls, Achievement Motivation, and the Glass Ceiling: Implications for Personal Potential. Summary of Keynote at The Alliance of Girls’ Schools Australasia Conference 2010 –.

Mastura, & Santaria, R. (2020). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Proses Pengajaran bagi Guru dan Siswa Pendahuluan. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 289–295

Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations, and recommendations for online learning during the covid-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27–S31.

Napsawati, N. (2020). Analisis Situasi Pembelajaran Ipa Fisika Dengan Metode Daring Di Tengah Wabah Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Terapannya, 3(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v3i1.546

Nayir, F. (2017). The Relationship between Student Motivation and Class Engagement Levels. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2017(71), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.71.4

Pangondian R. A., Santosa, P. I., & Nugroho, E. (2019). Faktor - Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kesuksesan Pembelajaran Daring Dalam Revolusi Industri 4.0. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS), 1(1), 56–60. https://www.prosiding.seminar-id.com/index.php/sainteks/article/view/122

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual fot the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Technical Report No. 91-B-004, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p156

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing Students' Engagement by Increasing Teachers' Autonomy Support¹. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f

Rimbarizki, R. (2017). Penerapan Pembelajaran Daring Kombinasi Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik Paket C Vokasi Di Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (Pkbm) Pioneer Karanganyar. J+Plus Unesa, 6(2), 1–12.

Rohmah, L. (2011). Konsep E-Learning dan Aplikasinya pada Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal An Nûr, 1(1), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v8i1.2099

Ryan, R. M., & Powelson, C. L. (1991). Autonomy and relatedness as fundamental to motivation and education. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1991.10806579

Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How Motivation Influences Student Engagement: A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252

Schunk, D., Meece, J., & Pintrich, P. (2014). Motivation in Education Theory, Research and Applications. In Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895238.ch8

Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004

Xiong, Y., Li, H., Kornhaber, M. L., Suen, H. K., Pursel, B., & Goins, D. D. (2015). Examining the Relations among Student Motivation, Engagement, and Retention in a MOOC : A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. 2(2015), 23–33.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Izzanil Hidayati, Meria Susanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Psychological Perspective
Published by:
Lucky Arya Residence 2 No. 18
Jalan HOS. Cokroaminoto Kab. Pringsewu
Lampung - Indonesia, Postal code 35373

Creative Commons License
Journal of Psychological Perspective is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.