Assessment of Psychological Needs and Quality of Life of Penitentiary Security Agents in the State of Paraíba

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.515522023

Keywords:

Anxiety, Impulsivity, Quality of Life, Penitentiary Security Agent

Abstract

The Penitentiary Security Agent (PSA) profession can expose individuals to risk, fear, and violence in the workplace, leading to high levels of stress and anxiety that can impact their quality of life. This study evaluated psychological needs and quality of life characteristics of a group of PSAs in Joao Pessoa, Paraiba. Anxiety levels, impulsiveness, and quality of life were evaluated in 64 professionals using various scales. The results showed that anxiety was moderate in men only in the Cognitive and Physiological scales and absent in the Motor and General Level of Anxiety scales. In women, moderate anxiety was observed in all four subscales. Quality of life was rated as regular in all four domains, with Social Relations being the best-structured and Environment being the lowest scoring domain. The evaluation of impulsivity showed a low score in the Lack of Concentration and Persistence factor, an extreme lower score in the Cognitive Control and Future Planning factors, and a medium score in the Audacity and Temerity factor. These results differ from the literature, indicating high anxiety scores and low quality of life for PSAs. Thus, further studies are needed to understand the impact of the work environment on the psyche of PSAs and develop actions to improve their psychological needs, manage anxiety and impulsivity, and positively impact their quality of life.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Amorim-Gaudêncio, C. (1998). Adaptación del Inventario de Situaciones y Respuestas de Ansiedad a la población brasileña: Resultados definitivos. Madrid: Congreso Iberoamericano de Psicología.

Alphin, C., & Debrix, F. (2021). Biopolitics in the “Psychic Realm”: Han, Foucault and neoliberal psychopolitics. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 019145372110330. doi:10.1177/01914537211033011

Alves, J. G. B., Tenório, M., Anjos, A. G. dos, & Figueroa, J. N. (2010). Qualidade de vida em estudantes de Medicina no início e final do curso: avaliação pelo Whoqol-bref. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 34(1), 91–96. doi:10.1590/s0100-55022010000100011

Ávila-Batista, A. C. (2011). Construção e estudos psicométricos de uma Escala de Avaliação da Impulsividade; Construction and psychometric studies of a Impulsivity Assessment Scale. Psico USF, 16(3), 285-295.

Ferreira, R. E. B., Menezes, L. C., & Dias, J. C. (2012). Relação da prevalência de atividade física com variáveis psicológicas e componentes da síndrome metabólica em agentes penitenciários de Belo Horizonte-MG. Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, 17(1), 57-63.

Fleck, M. P. A. (2000). O instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida da Organização Mundial da Saúde (WHOQOL-100): características e perspectivas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 5(1), 33-38.

Lakshmi, S. (2022). A study to assess the effectiveness of music therapy in controlling postoperative pain and anxiety among surgical patients (major abdominal surgery) in RMMCH, Annamalai University. Paripex Indian Journal of Research.

Lourenço, L. C. (2010). Batendo a tranca: Impactos do encarceramento em agentes penitenciários da Região Metropolitana de Belo Horizonte. Revista Dilemas, 3(10), 11-31.

Macedo, P. (2004). A pena de prisão no Brasil: uma análise à luz da sociologia do direito de Erving Goffman. Revista da Esmese, (7), 257-267.

Maculan, A. and Sterchele, L. (2022). “The “left” and “right” arm of the prison: Prison work and the local legal culture of the penitentiary”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(6), pp. 1492–1517. Available at: https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/1445

Mathews, A. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28(6), 455–468. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(90)90132-3

SISDEPEN (Sistema de Informações Estatísticas do Sistema Penitenciário Brasileiro). (2021). Informações gerais do sistema prisional brasileiro. Disponível em: https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiOWYwMDdlNmItMDNkOC00Y2RmLWEyNj.

Soares, M. M., & Bueno, P. M. M. G. (2016). Demography, vulnerabilities and right to health to Brazilian prison population. Ciênc. Saúde Colet., 21(7), https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015217.24102015

Von Diemen, L. (2006). Associação entre impulsividade, idade do primeiro consumo de álcool e abuso de substâncias psicoativas em adolescentes de uma região do sul do Brasil [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul].

Wang, J., E, M., Wu, Q., Xie, T., Dou, H., Lei, Y. (2021). Influence of Perceptual and Conceptual Information on Fear Generalization: A Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Study. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 21, 1054–1065. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-021-00912-x

Downloads

Published

2023-06-06

How to Cite

Amorim-Gaudêncio, C., da Silva, S. P., & Braz, L. F. G. (2023). Assessment of Psychological Needs and Quality of Life of Penitentiary Security Agents in the State of Paraíba. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 5(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.515522023

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Original Research Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright Policy

Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.

  • Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
  • By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  • This license permits others to:
    • Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
    • Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
    • As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
  • Authors may:
    • Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
    • Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.

Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication

To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:

  • Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
  • Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
  • Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
  • Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
  • Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
    • The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
    • Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
    • Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
  • Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
  • Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.