The Modern Regularity of Institutionalized Racism Towards Black Americans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.525502023Keywords:
racism, incarceration, systemic racism, family, African AmericanAbstract
African Americans have faced persistent institutionalized barriers and systemic racism both historically and in the present day. One of the most glaring manifestations of this is the racial disproportionality observed in incarceration rates. This paper delves into specific domains, such as the justice and social welfare systems, where institutional discrimination is evident, contributing to the disenfranchisement of African Americans. It further addresses the gap in literature concerning the impacts of such racial disproportionality in incarceration, especially the systemic challenges faced post-incarceration. The objective of this research is to delineate the facets of institutionalized racism towards African Americans in the context of incarceration and to propose evidence-based clinical interventions for professionals working with this demographic.
References
Aaronson, M. (2008). Intergenerational economic mobility in the United States, 1940 to 2000. Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 139–172. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.43.1.139.
Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. The New Press.
Assari, S., Miller, R. J., Taylor, R. J., Mouzon, D., Keith, V., & Chatters, L. M. (2017). Discrimination fully mediates the effects of incarceration history on depressive symptoms and psychological distress among African American men. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 5(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0364-y
Boen, C. E. (2020). Criminal justice contacts and psychophysiological functioning in early adulthood: Health inequality in the carceral state. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 61(3), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146520936208
Colen, C. G., Ramey, D. M., Cooksey, E. C., & Williams, D. R. (2018). Racial disparities in health among nonpoor African Americans and Hispanics: The role of acute and chronic discrimination. Social Science & Medicine, 199, 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.051
Collins, J. C., Rocco, T. S., & Bryant, L. O. (Eds.). (2014). Health and wellness concerns for racial, ethnic, and sexual minorities: New directions for adult and continuing education. John Wiley & Sons.
Ewert, S., Sykes, B. L., & Pettit, B. (2014). The degree of disadvantage: Incarceration and nequality in education. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 651(1), 24–43. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0002716213503100.
Hollie, B. D., & Coolhart, D. (2020). A larger system is placing people in this predicament: A qualitative exploration of living amongst urban violence and the impact on mental health and relationships in the Black community. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 42(4), 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-020-09546-6
James, J. (2010). Collateral costs: Incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Pew Charitable Trusts. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/15161/PEW_CollateralCosts.pdf?sequence=2
Kakade, M., Duarte, C.S., Liu, X., Fuller, C. J., Drucker, E, Hoven, C.W., Fan, B., & Wu, P. (2012). Adolescent substance use and other illegal behaviors and racial disparities in criminal justice system involvement: Findings from a US national survey. American Journal of Public Health 201, 1307–1310. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300699?role=tab
Kogan, S. M., Cho, J., Brody, G. H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2017). Pathways linking marijuana use to substance use problems among emerging adults: A prospective analysis of young Black men.” Addictive Behaviors,72, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.027.
Kohli, R., Pizarro, M. & Nevarez, A. (2017). The new racism of K–12 schools: Centering critical research on racism. Review of Research in Education, 41, 182-202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686949
Mukku, V. K, Benson, T. G., Alam, F., Richie, W. D.,& Bailey,R. K. (2012) Overview of substance use disorders and incarceration of African American males. Frontiers in Psyhcology, 3(98), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00098
Naz, S., Gregory, R., & Bahu, M. (2019). Addressing issues of race, ethnicity and culture in CBT to support therapists and service managers to deliver culturally competent therapy and reduce inequalities in mental health provision for BAME service users. Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 12, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X19000060
Ramaswamy, M., & Freudenberg, N. (2012). The cycle of social exclusion for urban, young men of color in the United States: What is the role of incarceration? Journal of Poverty, 16(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2011.639862
Schneider, V. (2018). The orison to homelessness pipeline: Criminal record checks, race, and disparate impact. Indiana Law Journal, 93(2), 421–455. https://doi.org/https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol93/iss2/4/
Tadros, E., Fye, J. M., McCrone, C. L., & Finney, N. (2019). Incorporating multicultural couple and family therapy into incarcerated settings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(4), 641–658. https://doiorg/10.1177/0306624X18823442
Tor, S. M., Watson, D., & Tadros, E. (2021). Discrimination, depression, and dyads: Experiences of discrimination influence the partner relationship. American Journal of Family Therapy, 50(3), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2021.1909512
Turney, K., & Goodsell, R. (2018). Parental incarceration and children’s wellbeing. The Future of Children, 28(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2018.0007
Walter, R. J., Viglione, J., & Tillyer, M. S. (2017). One strike to second chances: Using criminal backgrounds in admission decisions for assisted housing. Housing Policy Debate, 27(5), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2017.1309557Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eman Tadros

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Policy
Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.
- Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
- By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- This license permits others to:
- Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
- Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
- As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
- Authors may:
- Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
- Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.
Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication
To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:
- Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
- Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
- Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
- Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
- Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
- The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
- Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
- Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
- Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
- Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles

Submit Online


