Handedness and religiosity, a two-nation study: Evidence that hemispheric functioning may influence religious beliefs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.525872023

Keywords:

Handedness, Religiosity, hemispheric

Abstract

Prior research has reported that so-called consistent-handers are more religious than non-consistent-handers. This study analyzed data bearing on this possibility using large samples of college students from two different countries; Malaysia and the United States. When samples from both countries were separated by sex, no significant support for this prior research was found. However, when we analyzed our data with handedness dichotomized between right-handers and non-right-handers, some significant relationships were found. Among females in both countries, left- and mixed-handers expressed lower degrees of certainty about the existence of God and life-after-death. Also, right-handedness and religious service attendance were positively and significantly associated among Malaysian males. Among US males, however, belief in God was actually significantly stronger among right-handers than among left and mixed-handers. Assuming that right handedness is a rough proxy for left hemispheric dominance, our findings provide some support for the hypothesis that right hemispheric dominance is associated with orthodox religiosity at least among females.

References

Bradshaw, J. L. & Nettleton, N. C. (1981). The nature of hemispheric specialization in man, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 51-91.

Cavanagh, T.; Berbesque, J.C.; Wood, B.; Marlowe, F. (2016). Hadza handedness: Lateralized behaviors in a contemporary hunter–gatherer population. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 202–209.

Chen, E. Y. (2018). Handedness and religious beliefs: Testing the two possible accounts of authoritarianism and belief updating. Personality and Individual Differences, 127,101-106.

Chen, Q., Beaty, R. E., Cui, Z., Sun, J., He, H., Zhuang, K., . . . Qiu, J. (2019). Brain hemispheric involvement in visuospatial and verbal divergent thinking. Neuroimage, 202, 116065.

Christman, S. D., Henning, B. R., Geers, A. L., Propper, R. E., & Niebauer, C. L. (2008). Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality, 13, 403-426.

Clements, A. M., Rimrodt, S. L., Abel, J. R., Blankner, J. G., Mostofsky, S. H., Pekar, J. J., . . . Cutting, L. E. (2006). Sex differences in cerebral laterality of language and visuospatial processing. Brain and Language, 98, 150-158.

Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2004). Handedness, hemispheric asymmetries, and joke comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 275-288.

Davis, J. A. (1985). The logic of causal order (No. 55). Sage.

DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2006). Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography, 43, 1-24.

Dorius, S. F., & Firebaugh, G. (2010$). Trends in global gender inequality. Social Forces, 88, 1941-1968.

Ellis, L., Palmer, C. T., Hopcroft, R. & Hoskin, A. W. (2024a). Handbook of sex differences, Volume II: Cognitive Variables. Routledge (Taylor & Francis).

Ellis, L., Palmer, C. T., Hopcroft, R. & Hoskin, A. W. (2024b). Handbook of sex differences, Volume I: Basic Biology. Routledge (Taylor & Francis).

Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2005). Handedness, homicide and negative frequency-dependent selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 25-28.

Friesen, A., & Ksiazkiewicz, A. (2015). Do political attitudes and religiosity share a genetic path? Political Behavior, 37, 791-818.

Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336(6080), 493-496.

Hawes, Z., & Ansari, D. (2020). What explains the relationship between spatial and mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 465-482.

Heeren, T., & D'Agostino, R. (1987). Robustness of the two independent samples t‐test when applied to ordinal scaled data. Statistics in medicine, 6(1), 79-90.

Heilman, K. M., Nadeau, S. E., & Beversdorf, D. O. (2003). Creative innovation: possible brain mechanisms. Neurocase, 9, 369-379.

Kim, S.G.; Ashe, J.; Georgopoulos, A.P.; Merkle, H.; Ellermann, J.M.; Menon, R.S.; Ogawa, S.; Ugurbil, K. (1993). Functional imaging of human motor cortex at high magnetic field. J. Neurophysiology, 69, 297–302.

Kinsbourne, M. (1982). Hemispheric specialization and the growth of human understanding. American Psychologist, 37, 411-420.

Knecht, S., Dräger, B., Deppe, M., Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., Flöel, A., . . . Henningsen, H. (2000). Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain, 123, 2512-2518.

Kushner, H. I. (2013). Why are there (almost) no left-handers in China? Endeavour, 37, 71-81.

Mancini, C., & Mirabella, G. (2021). Handedness does not impact inhibitory control, but movement execution and reactive inhibition are more under a left-hemisphere control. Symmetry, 13(9), 1602, 1-20.

Medlanda, S., Duffy, D., Wright, M., Geffenc, G., Hayd, D., Levye, F., Boomsmaf, D. (2009). Genetic influences on handedness: Data from 25,732 Australian and Dutch twin families, Neuropsychologia, 47, 330-337.

Miller, A. S., & Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1399-1423.

Mutha, P.K.; Haaland, K.Y.; Sainburg, R.L. (2013). Rethinking motor lateralization: Specialized but complementary mechanisms for motor control of each arm. PLoS One 2013, 8, e58582.

Niebauer, C. L., Christman, S., Reid, S., & Garvey, K. (2004). Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: Degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution. Laterality, 9, 433-447.

Paracchini, S. (2021). Recent advances in handedness genetics. Symmetry, 13 (1792), 1-11.

Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In R.W. Robins et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224-239). Guilford Press.

Powell, J. L., Kemp, G. J., & García-Finaña, M. (2012). Association between language and spatial laterality and cognitive ability: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 59, 1818-1829.

Rausch, R. (1977). Cognitive strategies in patients with unilateral temporal lobe excisions. Neuropsychologia, 15(3), 385-395.

Sha, Z., Pepe, A., Schijven, D., Carrión-Castillo, A., Roe, J. M., Westerhausen, R., . . . Francks, C. (2021). Handedness and its genetic influences are associated with structural asymmetries of the cerebral cortex in 31,864 individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(47), e2113095118.

Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Adler, N., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D., & Mayseless, N. (2011). The origins of originality: the neural bases of creative thinking and originality. Neuropsychologia, 49, 178-185.

Sharma, S., & Ang, J. (2019, August 12-15). More for God-less for climate association of religiosity with stringency of climate change policies. International Conference on Applied Energy, Vasteras, Sweden.

Sommer, I. E., Aleman, A., Bouma, A., & Kahn, R. S. (2004). Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain, 127, 1845-1852.

Vance, T., Maes, H. H., & Kendler, K. S. (2010). Genetic and environmental influences on multiple dimensions of religiosity: A twin study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(10), 755-761.

Waller, N. G., Kojetin, B. A., Bouchard Jr, T. J., Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Genetic and environmental influences on religious interests, attitudes, and values: A study of twins reared apart and together. Psychological science, 1(2), 138-142.

Whitehouse, H. (2002). Modes of religiosity: Towards a cognitive explanation of the sociopolitical dynamics of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 14, 293-315.

Wiberg, A., Ng, M., Al Omran, Y., Alfaro-Almagro, F., McCarthy, P., Marchini, J., . . . Furniss, D. (2019). Handedness, language areas and neuropsychiatric diseases: insights from brain imaging and genetics. Brain, 142, 2938-2947.

Zimmer, Z., Jagger, C., Chiu, C.-T., Ofstedal, M. B., Rojo, F., & Saito, Y. (2016). Spirituality, religiosity, aging and health in global perspective: A review. SSM-Population Health, 2, 373-381.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-10

How to Cite

Ellis, L., Das, S., & Hoskin, A. W. (2024). Handedness and religiosity, a two-nation study: Evidence that hemispheric functioning may influence religious beliefs. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 5(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.525872023

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Original Research Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright Policy

Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.

  • Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
  • By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  • This license permits others to:
    • Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
    • Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
    • As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
  • Authors may:
    • Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
    • Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.

Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication

To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:

  • Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
  • Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
  • Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
  • Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
  • Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
    • The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
    • Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
    • Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
  • Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
  • Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles