Conflict Resolution Strategies among Adolescent Victims of Sexual Dating Violence: Emotional Dependence, Regulation, and Social Support
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.7412132025Keywords:
Adolescents, Conflict Resolution, Sexual Dating Violence, Emotional Regulation, Social SupportAbstract
Sexual dating violence (SDV) is a global public health concern affecting a significant proportion of adolescents, with prevalence estimates ranging from 20% to 50% worldwide and disproportionately impacting young women. In Indonesia and other Southeast Asian contexts, disclosure remains limited due to stigma and cultural barriers, leaving many adolescents isolated in unsafe relationships. Against this backdrop, this study aimed to explore how adolescent victims of SDV navigate conflict resolution within their intimate relationships and identify the psychological, interpersonal, and social factors shaping their strategies. Using a qualitative instrumental narrative design, five adolescent females aged 15–22 who had experienced SDV and received at least one year of psychosocial support were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and field observations and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s framework. The findings revealed four key themes: (1) reliance on withdrawal as the most frequent conflict resolution strategy, (2) the entrapment of emotional dependence counterbalanced by gradual growth in regulation skills, (3) conflict involvement characterized by cycles of escalation and gaslighting, and (4) the pivotal role of social and emotional support in resilience and recovery. The study highlights that conflict resolution in SDV contexts is less about repairing relationships and more about survival, agency, and dignity, offering theoretical reframing and practical implications for trauma-informed interventions.
References
Aguilera-Jiménez, N., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Rohlfs-Domínguez, P., Alameda-Bailén, J. R., & Paíno-Quesada, S. G. (2021). Relationships of Adolescent and Young Couples with Violent Behaviors: Conflict Resolution Strategies. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(6), 3201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063201
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bonache, H., Ramírez-Santana, G., & Gonzalez-Mendez, R. (2016). Conflict resolution styles and teen dating violence. International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP, 16(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.03.003
Bundock, K., Chan, C., & Hewitt, O. (2020). Adolescents’ help-seeking behavior and intentions following adolescent dating violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018770412
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Youth risk behavior survey data summary & trends report: 2009–2019. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Espelage, D. L., Leemis, R. W., Niolon, P. H., Kearns, M., Basile, K. C., & Davis, J. P. (2020). Teen Dating Violence Perpetration: Protective Factor Trajectories from Middle to High School among Adolescents. Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 30(1), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12510
Fernet, M., Hébert, M., Couture, S., & Brodeur, G. (2019). Meeting the needs of adolescent and emerging adult victims of sexual violence in their romantic relationships: A mixed methods study exploring barriers to help-seeking. Child Abuse & Neglect, 91, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.01.019
Gilbert, M., Fernet, M., Hébert, M., & Couture, S. (2023). Diversity of profiles and coping among adolescent girl victims of sexual dating violence. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 32(5), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2023.2195856
González-Méndez, R., Rojas-Solís, J. L., & Ramírez-Santana, G. (2018). Exploring conflict resolution and psychological abuse across romantic relationships. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 27(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1327912
Hamby, S., & Grych, J. (2013). The web of violence: Exploring connections among different forms of interpersonal violence and abuse. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5596-3
Kurdek, L. A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.2307/353528
Marcos, V., Treskow, L., Kuester, R., & Seijo, D. (2023). Sexual violence victimization: Prevalence in adolescents and disposition to forgive. Acción Psicológica, 20(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.20.2.39436
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Springer.
Piolanti, A., & Foran, H. M. (2022). Efficacy of interventions to prevent physical and sexual dating violence among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4829
Prameswari, F. H., & Nurchayati, N. (2021). Dinamika psikologis remaja perempuan korban kekerasan dalam pacaran yang memilih mempertahankan hubungan pacarannya. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 8(7), 204–217. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/character/article/view/42609
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Stermac, L., Cripps, J., Amiri, T., & Badali, V. (2020). Sexual violence and women’s education: Examining academic performance and persistence. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 50(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069649ar
Susanti, S., & Widyoningsih, W. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi sikap remaja tentang seks bebas. Jurnal Ilmu Keperawatan dan Kebidanan, 10(2), 297–304. https://ejr.umku.ac.id/index.php/jikk/article/view/721
Temple, J. R., Shorey, R. C., Fite, P., Stuart, G. L., & Le, V. D. (2013). Substance use as a longitudinal predictor of the perpetration of teen dating violence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(4), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9877-1
Wincentak, K., Connolly, J., & Card, N. (2017). Teen dating violence: A meta-analytic review of prevalence rates. Psychology of Violence, 7(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040194
Woolweaver, A. B., Abu Khalaf, N., Espelage, D. L., Zhou, Z., Reynoso Marmolejos, R., Calnan, M., & Mirsen, R. (2024). Outcomes Associated with Adolescent Dating and Sexual Violence Victimization: A Systematic Review of School-Based Literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(4), 2781-2796. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241226618
World Health Organization. (2016). Ethical and safety recommendations for intervention research on violence against women: Building on lessons from the WHO publication Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. WHO Press.
Young, C. M., & Huwae, A. (2022). Emotion regulation and dating violence among students in toxic relationships. Psychocentrum Review, 4(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.26539/pcr.43893
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright Policy
Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.
- Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
- By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- This license permits others to:
- Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
- Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
- As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
- Authors may:
- Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
- Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.
Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication
To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:
- Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
- Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
- Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
- Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
- Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
- The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
- Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
- Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
- Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
- Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles

Submit Online


