Openness Without Safety? Negotiated Visibility, Stigma, and Well-Being Among Female Sex Workers Living in Local Communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.8114212026Keywords:
Mental Health, Female Sex Workers, Negotiated Openness, Community Participation, StigmaAbstract
Female sex workers (FSWs) often manage a concealable, stigmatized identity, yet some are known within their neighborhoods. Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), this study examined how five Indonesian FSWs (35–45 years) living in Central Java made sense of “living openly” and mental health as emotional, psychological, and social well-being. “Living openly” was defined as negotiated openness: at least some community members (e.g., neighbors, informal leaders, and/or family) knew participants’ work status, while operational details were deliberately withheld. Participants were recruited via snowball sampling and completed in-depth interviews in Indonesian; excerpts were translated into English for reporting. Idiographic accounts converged in four cross-case themes: (1) boundary work that eased the burden of secrecy without requiring total disclosure; (2) emotional relief coexisting with vigilance as stigma resurfaced through gossip, moral judgment, harassment, and safety concerns; (3) psychological well-being sustained by time–space separation between work and home, privacy management, selective trust, and meaning anchored in caregiving roles; and (4) social well-being built through routine participation and visible contribution to community activities under conditional acceptance. The findings position openness as a continuing social practice through which well-being is reconstructed amid persistent stigma and structural vulnerability. Implications highlight harm-reduction norms, safe spaces, and family support.
References
Beattie, T. S., Smilenova, B., Krishnaratne, S., & Mazzuca, A. (2020). Mental health problems among female sex workers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine, 17(9), e1003297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003297
Chaudoir, S. R., & Fisher, J. D. (2010). The disclosure processes model: understanding disclosure decision making and postdisclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychological bulletin, 136(2), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018193
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Daniel, T. (2025). How do sex workers navigate stigma? A qualitative study and review of anti-stigma strategies. Sexualities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607231201736
Deering, K. N., Amin, A., Shoveller, J., Nesbitt, A., Garcia-Moreno, C., Duff, P., Argento, E., & Shannon, K. (2014). A systematic review of the correlates of violence against sex workers. American Journal of Public Health, 104(5), e42–e54. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301909
Galderisi, S., Heinz, A., Kastrup, M., Beezhold, J., & Sartorius, N. (2015). Toward a new definition of mental health. World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 14(2), 231–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20231
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
Harris, M. T. H., Shannon, K., Krüsi, A., Zhou, H., & Goldenberg, S. M. (2025). “It is just too hard”: Sex workers’ barriers to accessing primary care. BMC Health Services Research, 25, 12275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12275-x
Kaya, G., Kalinowski, O., Kroehn-Liedtke, F., Lotysh, A., Mihaylova, H., Zerbe, L., Rössler, W., & Schouler-Ocak, M.. (2025). The impact of self-stigmatization on the mental health of female sex workers (FSWs). Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1679876
Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197
Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539
La Kahija, Y. F. (2018). Penelitian fenomenologis: Jalan memahami pengalaman hidup. Kanisius.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Martín-Romo, L., Sanmartín, F. J., & Velasco, J. (2023). Invisible and stigmatized: A systematic review of mental health and risk factors among sex workers. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 148(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13559
Millan-Alanis, J. M., Carranza-Navarro, F., de León-Gutiérrez, H., Leyva-Camacho, P. C., Guerrero-Medrano, A. F., Barrera, F. J., Garza Lopez, L. E., & Saucedo-Uribe, E. (2021). Prevalence of suicidality, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and anxiety among female sex workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of women's mental health, 24(6), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-021-01144-1
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
Pachankis, J. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.328
Platt, L., Grenfell, P., Meiksin, R., Elmes, J., Sherman, S. G., Sanders, T., Mwangi, P., & Crago, A.-L. (2018). Associations between sex work laws and sex workers’ health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies. PLOS Medicine, 15(12), e1002680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002680
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Treloar, C., Stardust, Z., Cama, E., & Kim, J. (2021). Rethinking the relationship between sex work, mental health and stigma: a qualitative study of sex workers in Australia. Social science & medicine (1982), 268, 113468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113468
United Nations Population Fund. (n.d.). Implementation research: Community based HIV screening for female sex workers in 23 priority districts (Concept note). UNFPA Indonesia. https://indonesia.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/submissions/Concept%20note_CBS_IFP_10June.pdf
Winter, M. L., & Olivia, S. G. (2024). Sex Work and Parenthood: The Experiences of Female Sex Workers Who Are also Parents or Caregivers: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(7), 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21070852
World Health Organization. (2021). Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: Recommendations for a public health approach. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2022). Consolidated guidelines on HIV, viral hepatitis and STI prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations. World Health Organization.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riki Grahambel Palar, Arthur Huwae

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Policy
Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.
- Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
- By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- This license permits others to:
- Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
- Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
- As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
- Authors may:
- Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
- Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.
Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication
To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:
- Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
- Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
- Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
- Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
- Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
- The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
- Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
- Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
- Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
- Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles

Submit Online


