What Works and What Challenges in Blended Learning: A Qualitative Case Study of University Lecturers’ Perspectives at an Indonesian Public University

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.7412552025

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Digital Technology, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Lecturer Perception

Abstract

This qualitative case study was conducted at a public university in Indonesia. Blended learning is an instructional approach that combines face-to-face meetings with online learning activities. Its effectiveness depends significantly on the appropriate integration of digital technologies, particularly during synchronous and asynchronous online sessions. This study explores university lecturers’ perspectives on the implementation of blended learning as experienced by students. Employing a qualitative research design, data were collected through open-ended questionnaires and focus group discussions (FGDs). The participants comprised 37 lecturers from Padang State University, with five of them participating in the FGDs. The findings revealed four dominant themes in lecturers’ perceptions: (1) technical challenges, (2) diminished social interaction between students and lecturers as well as among students, (3) instructional effectiveness, and (4) lecturers’ digital competence. A concise conceptual model shows that technical constraints directly reduce social interaction and instructional effectiveness, while lecturers’ digital competence can mitigate these effects through purposeful design and facilitation. The implications emphasize the need for structured institutional support, including reliable campus connectivity and learning management system uptime, a sequenced and sustained program of pedagogical upskilling for lecturers, and clear integration guidelines that align online components with course learning outcomes, so that blended learning is scalable and effective in developing country contexts with similar conditions. This study provides context rich evidence from Indonesia and contributes to the international literature on blended learning implementation.

Author Biographies

Izzanil Hidayati, Universitas Negeri Padang

Izzanil Hidayati is a lecturer in the field of Educational Psychology at the Faculty of Psychology and Health, Universitas Negeri Padang. Her research focuses on higher education learning, blended learning, positive psychology, academic performance, and internet use.

Abdur Rahman, Universitas Syedza Saintika

Abdur Rahman is a lecturer in Clinical Psychology at the Psychology Program, Universitas Syedza Saintika. His research interests include problematic internet use, resilience, academic performance, and positive psychology.

Putri Sukma Deri, Universitas Negeri Padang

Putri Sukma Deri is a lecturer in Educational Psychology at the Faculty of Psychology and Health, Universitas Negeri Padang. Her research areas focus on student engagement, emotion, academic performance, and positive psychology.

Meria Susanti, Universitas Andalas

Meria Susanti is a lecturer at the Psychology Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas. Her research interests include school readiness, online learning, motivation, and positive psychology.

Yantri Maputra, Universitas Andalas

Yantri Maputra is a lecturer at the Psychology Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas. His research focuses on school climate, brawling behavior, school readiness, and positive psychology.

References

Alam, M. J., Ogawa, K., & Islam, S. R. Bin. (2023). e-Learning as a Doubled-Edge Sword for Academic Achievements of University Students in Developing Countries: Insights from Bangladesh. Sustainability, 15(9), 7282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097282

Al-Kahtani, N., Almurayh, A., Subbarayalu, A. V., Sebastian, T., Alkahtani, H., & Aljabri, D. (2022). Sustaining blended and online learning during the normal and new normal conditions in a Saudi higher education institution: health science students’ perspectives. Heliyon, 8(10), e10898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10898

Anthony Jnr, B. (2024). Examining Blended Learning Adoption Towards Improving Learning Performance in Institutions of Higher Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(3), 1401–1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09712-3

Aravind, B. S. (2024). Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of Blended Learning in a Technology–Enabled Education Environment. Journal of Effective Teaching and Learning Practices, 1(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.70372/jetlp.v1i1.2

Asadullah, M. N., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2022). Digital Divide or Digital Provide? Technology, Time Use, and Learning Loss during COVID-19. The Journal of Development Studies, 58(10), 1934–1957. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2094253

Azila-Gbettor, E. M., Abiemo, M. K., & Glate, S. N. (2023). University support and online learning engagement during the Covid-19 period: The role of student vitality. Heliyon, 9(1), e12832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12832

Aziz, Abd., Saddhono, K., & Setyawan, B. W. (2022). A parental guidance patterns in the online learning process during the COVID-19 pandemic: case study in Indonesian school. Heliyon, 8(12), e12158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12158

Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L.-A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8

Becher Araujo Moraes, S. (2023). Blended Learning In Higher Education: an Approach, a Model, and Two Theoretical Frameworks. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.24834/jotl.4.1.820

Bedi, A. (2023). Keep Learning: Student Engagement in an Online Environment. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3287

Buinytska, O., & Vasylenko, S. (2022). Corporate Standard For University Lecturer’s Digital Competence. Open Educational E-Environment of Modern University, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2022.121

Cao, Q. (2024). Blended Learning of College English in the Digital Age. Region - Educational Research and Reviews, 6(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.32629/rerr.v6i2.1659

Casanova, D., Alsop, G., & Huet, I. (2021). Giving away some of their powers! Towards learner agency in digital assessment and feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00168-6

Castro-Rodríguez, M. M., Marín-Suelves, D., López-Gómez, S., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. (2021). Mapping of Scientific Production on Blended Learning in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 11(9), 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090494

Chen, L. (2023). Transactional Distance and College Students’ Learning Engagement in Online Learning: The Chain Mediating Role of Social Presence and Autonomous Motivation. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume 16, 2085–2101. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S409294

Chen, X., & Feng, S. (2023). Exploring the relationships between social presence and teaching presence in online video‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(6), 1769–1785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12843

Dickinson, M., Eom, S., Kang, Y., Lee, C. M., & Sachs, R. (2008). A balancing act: how can intelligent computer-generated feedback be provided in learner-to-learner interactions? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802343702

Fan, S., Trimble, A., Kember, D., Muir, T., Douglas, T., Wang, Y., Masters, J., & Mainsbridge, C. (2024). Supporting engagement and retention of online and blended-learning students: A qualitative study from an Australian University. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(1), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00605-5

Finlay, M. J., Tinnion, D. J., & Simpson, T. (2022). A virtual versus blended learning approach to higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experiences of a sport and exercise science student cohort. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100363

Flores-González, N., Flores-González, E., Castelán Flores, V., & Zamora Hernández, M. (2024). Students’ perceptions towards blended learning modality after COVID-19 pandemic: a case study. ECORFAN Journal Republic of Nicaragua, 10(18). https://doi.org/10.35429/EJRN.2024.10.18.1.11

Gherghel, C., Yasuda, S., & Kita, Y. (2023). Interaction during online classes fosters engagement with learning and self-directed study both in the first and second years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Education, 200, 104795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104795

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Mayorga-Fernández, M. J. (2020). Prediction of Factors That Affect the Knowledge and Use Higher Education Professors from Spain Make of ICT Resources to Teach, Evaluate and Research: A Study with Research Methods in Educational Technology. Education Sciences, 10(10), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100276

Harb, J., & Krish, P. (2020). Cognitive Presence in a Blended Learning Environment at Jordanian Universities. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.4

Kallas, K., & Pedaste, M. (2022). How to Improve the Digital Competence for E-Learning? Applied Sciences, 12(13), 6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136582

Khalaf, M. E., Abubakr, N. H., & Ziada, H. (2023). Students’ Experience of Online Learning in a Blended Learning Setting: A Qualitative Evaluation. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070725

Khattak, A. S., Ali, M. K., & Al Awadh, M. (2022). A Multidimensional Evaluation of Technology-Enabled Assessment Methods during Online Education in Developing Countries. Sustainability, 14(16), 10387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610387

Koh, J. H. L., & Daniel, B. K. (2022). Shifting online during COVID-19: A systematic review of teaching and learning strategies and their outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00361-7

Li, F. (2022). “Are you there?”: Teaching presence and interaction in large online literature classes. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00180-3

Lu, D. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of a Blended Learning Environment to Promote Critical Thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696845

Majewska, I. A., & Zvobgo, V. (2023). Students’ Satisfaction with Quality of Synchronous Online Learning Under the COVID 19 Pandemic: Perceptions from Liberal Arts and Science Undergraduates. Online Learning, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3201

Mamarajabov, M. E. (2022). Technologies Of Digital Didactics. European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 02(04), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-02-04-16

Nikolopoulou, K., & Zacharis, G. (2023). Blended Learning in a Higher Education Context: Exploring University Students’ Learning Behavior. Education Sciences, 13(5), 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050514

Osgerby, J. (2013). Students’ Perceptions of the Introduction of a Blended Learning Environment: An Exploratory Case Study. Accounting Education, 22(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2012.729341

Parkhatova, R. M., & Imramzieva, S. D. (2022). What Is Blended Learning?// International Journal of Educational and Scientific Research 1(14), 2022/ Chief Editor D. Sidorkin /OEAPS OU - Tallinn, Estonia (Open European Academy of Public Sciences). Marseille, France 30.04.2022: OEAPS OU., 2022 - P. 90-96. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/x6bez

Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in an Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007

Petrakova, A. S. (2023). The Use of Blended and Hybrid Learning in Contemporary Russian Pedagogical Practice. Alma Mater. Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly, 1, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-23.047

Presley, R. G., Cumberland, D. M., & Rose, K. (2023). A Comparison of Cognitive and Social Presence in Online Graduate Courses: Asynchronous vs. Synchronous Modalities. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3046

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190

Salcedo, M. D. C. N. (2022). Perception of Blended Learning in Faculty and Students of Higher Learning. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i3.3069

Sapta Aji, R. H., Astuti, B., & Saptono, S. (2022). The Analysis of Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes through the Implementation of Blended Learning in Junior High Schools Science. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v10i1.45692

Smith, C., Waters, M., Petterd, R., & Okinda, R. (2023). Digital and Professional Teacher Competency Standards for Blended TVET. Commonwealth of Learning (COL). https://doi.org/10.56059/11599/5408

Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., & Jumbo, F. T. (2020). Digital Literacy and Higher Education during COVID-19 Lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. Publications, 8(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8040048

Tomej, K., Liburd, J., Blichfeldt, B. S., & Hjalager, A.-M. (2022). Blended and (not so) splendid teaching and learning: Higher education insights from university teachers during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100144

Toscu, S. (2023). Exploring classroom interaction in online education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11517–11543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11622-x

Trypke, M., Stebner, F., & Wirth, J. (2023). Two types of redundancy in multimedia learning: a literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148035

Vo Thi, B., & Hoang, H. (2024). Digital competency – Perspectives of teacher students and primary teachers. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(12), 2024216. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024216

Volkova, N., Poyasok, T., Symonenko, S., Yermak, Y., Varina, H., & Rackovych, A. (2022). Psychological and pedagogical features: the use of digital technology in a blended learning environment. Revista Tempos e Espaços Em Educação, 15(34), e17232. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v15i34.17232

Wei, Z. (2023). Navigating Digital Learning Landscapes: Unveiling the Interplay Between Learning Behaviors, Digital Literacy, and Educational Outcomes. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3), 10516–10546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01522-3

Yang, H. (2024). From digital literacy to digital competence: The structure of Teacher Digital Competence (TDC). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2437675

Yao, Y., Wang, P., Jiang, Y., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2022). Innovative online learning strategies for the successful construction of student self-awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Merging TAM with TPB. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252

Zhu, R., Alias, B. S., Hamzah, M. I. M., & Hamid, M. R. A. (2024). A Threefold Examination of University Digital Leadership, Teacher Digital Competency, and Teacher Technology Behavior for Digital Transformation of Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.13

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05

How to Cite

Hidayati, I., Rahman, A., Deri, P. S., Susanti, M., & Maputra, Y. (2025). What Works and What Challenges in Blended Learning: A Qualitative Case Study of University Lecturers’ Perspectives at an Indonesian Public University. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 7(4), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.7412552025

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025)

Section

Original Research Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright Policy

Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.

  • Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
  • By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  • This license permits others to:
    • Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
    • Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
    • As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
  • Authors may:
    • Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
    • Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.

Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication

To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:

  • Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
  • Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
  • Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
  • Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
  • Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
    • The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
    • Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
    • Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
  • Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
  • Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.