The independent and interdependent self-affirmations in action: Understanding their dynamics in India during the early phase of the COVID-19 lockdown
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.616762024Keywords:
COVID-19 pandemic, Indian family, thematic analysis, religious and familial practices, self-affirmation, threatAbstract
The study explored the role of two dissimilar familial and religious practices in distinctly shaping independent and interdependent self-affirmations in two value systems (individualism and collectivism) that emerged to protect self-integrity and self-worth challenged by the threats of COVID-19. A qualitative research design was employed. A heterogeneous sample of 19 participants (10 joint and 9 nuclear families) was recruited who reported in a semi-structured interview about the consequences of COVID-19 and the role of family and religious values in coping with the pandemic threats. The thematic method was used to analyse the data. Codes were generated using a priori criteria while reviewing and re-reviewing, multiple discussions and iterations helped in theme identification and ascertaining validity. Five themes were generated: perceived strong threat of COVID-19, dissimilar genesis of independent and interdependent self-affirmations, positive roles of joint familial values, significance of religious values, and traditional and modern religious routes of self-affirmation. Threats were expressed in experiences of anxiety, uncertainty and mood fluctuations. Interdependence, affiliation and support were joint familial values whereas independence and self-esteem reflected nuclear family-values. Focus on explicit attributes denoted modern while divine interpretation and will of God reflected traditional religious values. Novelty, uncertainty and incurability of COVID-19 caused threats to self-integrity that compelled hem to affirm their most preferred values originating from two family forms. The pandemic posed threats to their self-worth, which in turn, activated affirmations in two distinct value systems leading to the development of independent and interdependent self-affirmations. Study findings will help surface novel features of the two self-affirmations. It provides new insights for making successful behavioural changes at individual, group and community levels for the success of social, health and educational policies.
References
Alexander, K. M. (2014). Self-affirmation: A regulatory fit analysis [University of Pittsburgh ETD]. University of Pittsburgh. http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/20908/
Armitage, C. J. (2012). Evidence that self-affirmation reduces body dissatisfaction by basing self-esteem on domains other than body weight and shape: Self-affirmation and body satisfaction. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02442.x
Badea, C., Binning, K. R., Sherman, D. K., Boza, M., & Kende, A. (2021). Conformity to group norms: How group-affirmation shapes collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, 104153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104153
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ, 322(7294), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
Bhanot, D., Singh, T., Verma, S. K., & Sharad, S. (2021). Stigma and Discrimination During COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.577018
Bhatt, S. (2020, May 22). Family in forefront during lockdown. Times of India Blog. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/sanjaiuvach/family-in-forefront-during-lockdown-20065/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Breakwell, G. M. (2017). Coping with threatened identities. Psychology Press.
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
Burson, A., Crocker, J., & Mischkowski, D. (2012). Two Types of Value-Affirmation: Implications for Self-Control Following Social Exclusion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611427773
Cai, H., Sedikides, C., & Jiang, L. (2013). Familial Self as a Potent Source of Affirmation: Evidence From China. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612469039
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
Chaudhuri, N. C. (2003). Autobiography of an unknown Indian (20. Jaico impr). Jaico Publ. House.
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2007). Self-affirmation theory. In R. Baumeister & K. Vohs, Encyclopedia of Social Psychology (pp. 787–789). SAGE Publications.
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 333–371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137
Creswell, J. D., Dutcher, J. M., Klein, W. M. P., Harris, P. R., & Levine, J. M. (2013). Self-Affirmation Improves Problem-Solving under Stress. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e62593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062593
Creswell, J. D., Welch, W. T., Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Gruenewald, T. L., & Mann, T. (2005). Affirmation of Personal Values Buffers Neuroendocrine and Psychological Stress Responses. Psychological Science, 16(11), 846–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01624.x
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
de Zwart, O., Veldhuijzen, I. K., Elam, G., Aro, A. R., Abraham, T., Bishop, G. D., Voeten, H. A. C. M., Richardus, J. H., & Brug, J. (2009). Perceived Threat, Risk Perception, and Efficacy Beliefs Related to SARS and Other (Emerging) Infectious Diseases: Results of an International Survey. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-008-9008-2
Fatima, H., Oyetunji, T. P., Mishra, S., Sinha, K., Olorunsogbon, O. F., Akande, O. S., Srinivasan, & Kar, S. K. (2022). Religious coping in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic in India and Nigeria: Finding of a cross-national community survey. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 68(2), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020984511
Ferrer, R. A., Shmueli, D., Bergman, H. E., Harris, P. R., & Klein, W. M. P. (2012). Effects of Self-Affirmation on Implementation Intentions and the Moderating Role of Affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611419265
Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839
Gautam, A. (2020, June 2). IIM Indore Study: Joint family reduces stress of Covid crisis. https://www.freepressjournal.in/indore/iim-indore-study-joint-family-reduces-stress-of-covid-crisis
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
Gupta, M., & Sukamto, K. (2020). Cultural Communicative Styles: The Case of India and Indonesia. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 0, 1–16.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2004). Investigating attitudes cross-culturally: A case of cognitive dissonance among East Asians and North Americans. In G. Haddock & G. R. Maio, Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (pp. 375–397). Psychology Press.
Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Kitayama, S., & Lackenbauer, S. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of Easterners and Westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.294
Jaspal, R., Lopes, B., & Wignall, L. (2020). The Coping with Identity Threat Scale: Development and Validation in a University Student Sample. Identity, 20(4), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2020.1808469
Jiao, W. Y., Wang, L. N., Liu, J., Fang, S. F., Jiao, F. Y., Pettoello-Mantovani, M., & Somekh, E. (2020). Behavioral and Emotional Disorders in Children during the COVID-19 Epidemic. The Journal of Pediatrics, S002234762030336X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.013
Jovchelovitch, S., & Priego-Hernández, J. (2015). Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public spheres. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (1st ed., pp. 163–178). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323650.014
Kapur, P., Mishra, G., & Das, M. (2011). “Who are we?” representation of Indianness among Indian youth. In P. Singh, P. Bain, C.-H. Leong, G. Mishra, & Y. Ohtsubo, Individual group and cultural processes in changing societies (pp. 247–261). Macmillan.
Koshy, J. (2020, April 19). Coronavirus | Is the lockdown helping India? The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/coronavirus-is-the-lockdown-helping-india/article31378067.ece
Lad, D. (2015, September 26). Muslims offer prayers at Ganpati pandal, Hindus participate in Eid festivities. DNA India. https://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-muslims-offer-prayers-at-ganpati-pandal-hindus-participate-in-eid-festivities-2129031
Leventhal, H., Leventhal, E. A., & Contrada, R. J. (1998). Self-regulation, health, and behavior: A perceptual-cognitive approach. Psychology & Health, 13(4), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407425
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
Li, S., Wu, Y., Zhang, F., Xu, Q., & Zhou, A. (2020). Self-affirmation buffering by the general public reduces anxiety levels during the COVID-19 epidemic. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(7), 886–894. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00886
Li, S., Xu, Q., & Zhou, A. (2022). Follow-up to a randomized controlled trial of the effect of self-affirmation on anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 27(2), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1917770
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2020a). Definition of Joint family. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/joint+family
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2020b). Definition of nuclear family. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nuclear+family
Narayan, S. (2019, October 12). This Indian Life by Shoba Narayan: What are Indian family values? Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/brunch/this-indian-life-by-shoba-narayan-what-are-indian-family-values/story-TB7L1FZ7lRruBWh3WU6GuL.html
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (Fourth edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, Organization, and Crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 21(1), 231–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1998.11678952
Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2013). Theorizing crisis communication. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The Psychology of Self‐defense: Self‐Affirmation Theory. In M. P. Zanna, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183–242). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5
Sherman, D. K., & Kim, H. S. (2005). Is There an “I” in “Team”? The Role of the Self in Group-Serving Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.108
Shnabel, N., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Cook, J. E., Garcia, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2013). Demystifying Values-Affirmation Interventions: Writing About Social Belonging Is a Key to Buffering Against Identity Threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213480816
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302
Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kâğitçibaşi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Cross-cultural research and methodology series, Vol. 18. Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 123–136). Sage Publications.
Smith, P. B., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (Second Edition, Social Behavior and applications, Vol. 3, pp. 77–118). Allyn & Bacon.
Tiwari, G. K., Kashyap, A. K., Rai, P. K., Tiwari, R. P., & Pandey, R. (2022). Collective Affirmation in Action: Understanding the Success of Lockdown in India During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Research & Health, 12(3), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.32598/JRH.12.3.1992.1
Tiwari, G. K., Singh, A. K., Parihar, P., Pandey, R., Sharma, D. N., & Rai, P. K. (2021). Understanding the perceived psychological distress and health outcomes of children during COVID-19 pandemic. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2021.1899749
Tiwari, G. K., Tiwari, R. P., Pandey, R., Ray, B., Dwivedi, A., Sharma, D. N., Singh, P., Tiwari, A. K., & Singh, A. K. (2024). Perceived life outcomes of Indian children during the early phase of the COVID-19 lockdown: The protective roles of joint and nuclear families. Journal of Research and Health, 14(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.32598/jrh.14.1.1992.4
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
Verma, R., Uzaina, U., Manickam, S., Singh, T., & Tiwari, G. K. (2024). Exploring the Psycho-Social Impact of COVID-19: Global Perspectives on Behaviour, Interventions and Future Directions (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003357209
Yeager, K. R., & Roberts, A. R. (2015). Bridging the Past and Present to the Future of Crisis Intervention and Crisis Management. In K. R. Yeager & A. R. Roberts, Crisis Intervention Handbook: Assessment, Treatment, and Research (Fourth, pp. 3–35). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright Policy
Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.
- Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
- By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- This license permits others to:
- Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
- Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
- As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
- Authors may:
- Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
- Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.
Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication
To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:
- Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
- Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
- Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
- Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
- Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
- The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
- Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
- Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
- Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
- Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles
Submit Online
