Emotion and Cognition Risk and Reward of Digital Scrolling among Emerging Adult

Authors

  • Cicilia Larasati Rembulan <span lang="EN">Department of Psychology,  Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Ciputra Surabaya</span>, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-4009
  • Meilani Sandjaja Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Ciputra Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-1788

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.8314792026

Keywords:

Cognitive impact, emotional impact, instant gratification theory, scrolling behavior, young adult

Abstract

Previous studies have largely examined the positive and negative impacts of social media use. This research broadens the scope to a wider behavioral pattern, namely digital scrolling behavior. Unlike earlier studies that employed the instant gratification theoretical framework, this study applies the instant gratification theory to identify the triggering situations that drive young adults to engage in digital scrolling behavior and to explore the dynamics that occur once they have obtained instant gratification. Adopting a qualitative approach, this study offers novelty compared to prior research that predominantly relied on quantitative methods. Data were collected from 309 personal diaries completed over one month by 65 young adults and analyzed thematically. The findings reveal situational factors triggering digital scrolling behavior, including activity-related, emotion- related, and external-related situations. Instant gratifications obtained include entertainment, product discovery, inspiration, escape from problems, and access to information. Participants reported both positive and negative emotional outcomes. Typically, digital scrolling was triggered by specific situations, leading to instant gratification and positive emotions. However, when digital scrolling behavior is unregulated, these positive emotions shift into negative ones. This study contributes novelty by providing deeper insights into scrolling behavior through the lens of instant gratification theory, highlighting the triggering situations, and the dynamic of its dual emotional consequences.

Author Biographies

Cicilia Larasati Rembulan, <span lang="EN">Department of Psychology,  Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Ciputra Surabaya</span>

Cicilia Larasati Rembulan is a psychology lecturer at Universitas Ciputra. Her research focuses on social exchange, perceived reward, power relation, community enterprise and place-making.

Meilani Sandjaja, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Ciputra Surabaya

Meilani Sandjaja is a psychology lecturer at Universitas Ciputra. Her research focuses on developmental and education psychology.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik telekomunikasi Indonesia 2024. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Choi, E. J., Christiaans, E., & Duerden, E. G. (2025). Screen time woes: Social media posting, scrolling, externalizing behaviors, and anxiety in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 170, 108688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108688

Colak, B. (2024). Special topic: Potential harms of excessive social media and smartphone use on youth mental health. In Pediatric Nonadherence (pp. 59–70). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58141-0_4

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Davis, K., Landesman, R., Yoon, J., Kim, J., Munoz Lopez, D. E., Magis-Weinberg, L., & Hiniker, A. (2025, April). " You go through so many emotions scrolling through instagram": how teens use instagram to regulate their emotions. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713844.

de Segovia Vicente, D., Van Gaeveren, K., Murphy, S. L., & Vanden Abeele, M. M. (2024). Does mindless scrolling hamper well-being? Combining ESM and log-data to examine the link between mindless scrolling, goal conflict, guilt, and daily well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1), https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad056.

Galak, J. & Redden, J.P. (2018). The properties and antecedents of hedonic decline. Annual Review of Psychology. Annual Review Psychology, 69,1-25

Gao, P., Jiang, H., Xie, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2021). The triggering mechanism of short video customer-inspiration- Qualitative analysis based on the repertory grid technique. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 791567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021/791567.

George, A. S., George, A. H., Baskar, T., & Karthikeyan, M. M. (2024). Reclaiming our minds: mitigating the negative impacts of excessive doomscrolling. Partners Universal Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(3), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13737987.

Goldfus, T. B. (2023). The impact of social media use on depression, anxiety, and well-being for teens/young people: Using hypnosis to build a strong sense of self. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 66(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2023.2240863

Hämäläinen, A., Salo, M., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2024). Surfing, scrolling, and stressing: Technostress in browsing digital content feeds on smartphones from the gratifications and dimensions of use perspective. Human Technology, 20 (3), 640-675. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3.11.

Haryanto, A. T. (2024, January). APJII: Jumlah Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tembus 221 Juta Orang. Detikinet. https://inet.detik.com/cyberlife/d7169749/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-jutaorang.

Holmgren, H. G., & Coyne, S. M. (2017). Can’t stop scrolling!: Pathological use of social networking sites in emerging adulthood. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(5), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2017.1294164

Holton, A. E., & Chyi, H. I. (2012). News and the overloaded consumer: Factors influencing information overload among news consumers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(11), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0610

Hu, H.-f., & Krishen, A. S. (2019). When is enough, enough? Investigating product reviews and information overload from a consumer empowerment perspective. Journal of Business Research, 100, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.011

Jovicic, S. (2020). Scrolling and the in‐between spaces of boredom: Marginalized youths on the periphery of Vienna. Ethos, 48(4), 498-516.

Jungselius, B. (2024). A scoping review of current research on social media use among children and adolescents. Discover Psychology, 4(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-024-00226-2.

Kumar, A., Krishnamurthi, R., Bhatia, S., Kaushik, K., Ahuja, N. J., Nayyar, A., & Masud, M. (2021). Blended learning tools and practices: A comprehensive analysis. Ieee Access, 9, 85151- 85197. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844.

Liu Y, Yi H, Jiang C. Enjoyment or Indulgence? Social Media Service Usage, Social Gratification, Self-Control Failure and Emotional Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):1002. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021002.

Loid, K., Rozgonjuk, D., Raudsepp, L., & Kais, K. (2020). Do pop-up notifications regarding smartphone use decrease screen time and problematic smartphone use? Evidence from a two-month experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.018

Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2012). When social networking turns to social overload: Explaining the stress, emotional exhaustion, and quitting behavior from social network sites' users. In ECIS 2012 Proceedings. Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2012/71/

Mancini, Bianca, "The Effects of Scrolling: Social Media Takeover" (2019). Advanced Writing: Pop Culture Intersections. 37. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/engl_176/37

Marano, G., Lisci, F. M., Rossi, S., Marzo, E. M., Boggio, G., Brisi, C., Traversi, G., Mazza, O., Pola, R., Gaetani, E., & Mazza, M. (2025). Connected but at risk: social media exposure and psychiatric and psychological outcomes in youth. Children, 12(10), 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12101322

Matama R, Mbago M, Ngoboka P (2020) Instant gratification behavior among gambling individuals in Uganda. J Gambl Stud 37(2):551–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09973-y.

Miles M, Huberman M, & Saldana J (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511404408

Mokry, N. (2024). Instant gratification: a decline in our attention and a rise in digital disinformation (Doctoral dissertation).

Montag, C., & Elhai, J. D. (2023). On social media design, (online-)time well-spent and addictive behaviors in the age of surveillance capitalism. Current Addiction Reports, 10(3), 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-023-00494-3

Ribeiro, J. F., & Peeters, D. (2021). The Relationship Between Instant Gratification and Actual Social Media Use.

Rixen, J. O., Meinhardt, L. M., Glöckler, M., Ziegenbein, M. L., Schlothauer, A., Colley, M., ... & Gugenheimer, J. (2023). The loop and reasons to break it: Investigating infinite scrolling behaviour in social media applications and reasons to stop. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(MHCI), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3604275.

Roffarello, A. M., & De Russis, L. (2023). The race towards digital well-being: Issues and opportunities in digital self-control tools. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(MHCI). https://doi.org/10.1145/3610890

Rokito, S., Choi, Y. H., Taylor, S. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2019). Over-gratified, under-gratified, or just right? Applying the gratification discrepancy approach to investigate recurrent Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 76-83

Russett, J., & Waldron, L. (2017). It’s Not Real Until It’s on Facebook: A Qualitative Analysis of Social Media and Digital Communication among Emerging Adults in College. Social Sciences, 6(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6030074

Saldana, J. (2021). Coding techniques for quantitative and mixed data. The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis, 151-160.

Sarraf, F., & Varmazyar, S. (2022). Comparing the effect of the posture of using smartphones on head and neck angles among college students. Ergonomics, 65(12), 1631–1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2047229

van Endert, T. S. (2022). Screen time and impulsivity: Exploring the association between use of digital devices and delay discounting (Doctoral dissertation).

Shahab, H., Ghazali, E., & Mohtar, M. (2022). A systematic literature review and future research agenda for the gratification discrepancies approach. Contemporary Management Research, 18(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.21583

Srivastava, A., Saxena, D., & Dwivedi, N. (2024). Mindful scrolling: nurturing mental health through digital citizenship in the digital deluge. TEJAS J Technologies Humanitarian Sci, 3.

Stake, R., & Visse, M. (1995). Case study research. Cham: Springer.

Stephens, G. C., Ottrey, E., & Matthews, K. (2026). A practical guide to using diary methods in qualitative research. Anatomical sciences education, 19(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70102

Stockdale, L. A., & Coyne, S. M. (2020). Bored and online: Reasons for using social media, problematic social networking site use, and behavioral outcomes across the transition from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.010.

Sulaiman, W. A. W., Malek, M. D. H., Yunus, A. R., Ishak, N. H., Safir, D. M., & Fahrudin, A. (2024). The impact of social media on mental health: a comprehensive review. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 1468–1482. https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.2564.

Susilowati IH, Kurniawidjaja LM, Nugraha S, Nasri SM, Pujiriani I, Hasiholan BP. The prevalence of bad posture and musculoskeletal symptoms originating from the use of gadgets as an impact of the work from home program of the university community. Heliyon. 2022 Oct;8(10):e11059. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11059.

Sümer, C., & Büttner, O. B. (2022). I’ll do it—After one more scroll: The effects of boredom proneness, self-control, and impulsivity on online procrastination. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 918306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918306.

Tafesse, W., Aguilar, M. P., Sayed, S., & Tariq, U. (2024). Digital overload, coping mechanisms, and student engagement: An empirical investigation based on the S-O-R framework. SAGE Open, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241236087

Vorderer P, Hefner D, Reinecke L, et al. (2018) Permanently Online, Permanently Connected: Living and Communicating in a POPC World. New York: Routledge.

Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guildford Press.

Yin, B., & Shen, Y. (2024). Development and validation of the compensatory belief scale for the internet instant gratification behavior. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e23972.

Yousef, A. M. F., Alshamy, A., Tlili, A., & Metwally, A. H. S. (2025). Demystifying the new dilemma of brain rot in the digital era: A review. Brain Sciences, 15(3), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030283

Zhao, H., & Wagner, C. (2023). Factors influencing TikTok-based user purchase intention: Comparison between potential customers and repeat customers. Internet Research, 34(6), 1901–1931. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-07-2022-0542

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Rembulan, C. L., & Sandjaja, M. (2026). Emotion and Cognition Risk and Reward of Digital Scrolling among Emerging Adult. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 8(3), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.8314792026

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026)

Section

Original Research Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Cicilia Larasati Rembulan, Meilani Sandjaja

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright Policy

Journal of Psychological Perspective (JOPP) is committed to promoting academic freedom and open access. To that end, we apply a copyright policy that empowers authors while ensuring the broad dissemination and responsible reuse of published work.

  • Authors retain the full copyright of their published manuscripts.
  • By publishing in JOPP, authors grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  • This license permits others to:
    • Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format),
    • Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially),
    • As long as appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and derivative works are distributed under the same license.
  • Authors may:
    • Deposit and share the published version of their work in institutional repositories or personal websites.
    • Enter into separate, non-exclusive distribution agreements, provided that original publication in JOPP is properly cited.

Licensing and Copyright for Data Publication

To promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in research, Journal of Psychological Perspective adopts the following policies regarding the publication of research data:

  • Copyright Ownership: Authors retain copyright over the datasets they submit or make available in connection with their articles.
  • Default License: All data associated with a published manuscript must be shared under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), unless otherwise agreed upon with the editor.
  • Permitted Use: This license allows others to use, modify, and distribute the dataset (including for commercial purposes), provided that attribution is given to the original authors and that derivative works are shared under the same terms.
  • Repository: Authors are strongly encouraged to deposit copies of their accepted manuscripts in institutional repositories or subject-specific archives. (e.g., OSF, Zenodo, Figshare) and include citations and links to the datasets in the article.
  • Ethical and Legal Responsibility: Authors must ensure:
    • The data shared do not breach confidentiality, privacy, or legal agreements.
    • Informed consent has been obtained where necessary.
    • Data have been properly anonymized where applicable.
  • Alternate Licenses: In exceptional cases, alternative data licenses (e.g., CC0, Open Data Commons) may be considered upon editorial approval. A written justification must be submitted and published alongside the article.
  • Corrections or Retractions: If issues related to published data arise (e.g., ethical breaches, significant errors), JOPP reserves the right to take corrective action in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Please read our policy about retraction of articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.